两个长期不同实验性耕作作物产量及粉质耕地土壤N2O排放量模型.doc

两个长期不同实验性耕作的作物产量及粉质耕地土壤的N2O排放量模型 B. Ludwiga,*, A. Bergstermannb, E. Priesackc, H. Flessab,d 摘要：耕作方式的选择会影响作物生长和土壤氮素动态。Models help us to better understand these systems and the interaction of the processes involved.模型可以帮助我们更好地了解这些系统和互动的过程。Objectives were to test a calibration and validation scheme for applications of the denitrification–decomposition (DNDC) model to describe a long-term field experiment with conventional tillage (CT) and reduced tillage (RT) at two sites (G and H, silty Haplic Luvisols) near G?ttingen, Germany (G-CT, G-RT, H-CT, H-RT).测试应用程序的反硝化分解（DNDC）模型的校准和验证计划的目标是描述一个长期的田间试验，与传统耕作（CT）和少耕（RT）在德国哥廷根（G-CT，G-H-RT，CT，H-RT）附近的两个站点（G，H，粉质淋溶土）。 Crop growth of field bean ( Vicia faba L.) and winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) as well as soil water dynamics and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions were determined for two subsequent years.随后两年被确定为作物生长的豆（ 蚕豆 ）和小麦（ 小麦 ），以及土壤水分动态和一氧化二氮（N 2 O）排放量。 A model test was performed based on a model parameterization to best describe the case G-CT.一个模型参数的基础上进行的模型试验最好的描述G-CT。 This parameterization was then applied to the other cases as a retrospective simulation.此参数化作为一个追溯模拟施加到的其他情况。 Results of model variant v1 (no parameter optimization) indicated that soil water contents were not accurately simulated using the DNDC default values for a silt loam.模型的变体V1（没有参数优化）的结果表明，土壤水分含量不是准确的模拟使用DNDC默认值的粉质壤土。After successful calibration of the soil water flow model using modified water-filled pore spaces at field capacity and wilting point and a modified hydro-conductivity that led to a good fit of the measured water content data, grain yields were markedly underestimated and modelled N 2 O emissions were too large (v2).田间持水量和凋萎点和改进的水力传导性，导致所测得的含水量数据好合适的采用改良的充水孔隙空间的土壤水分运移模型校准成功后，粮食产量显着低估和模拟N 2 O排放量太大（V2）。 An optimization of the crop properties (maximum grain yield, N fixation index, thermal degree days, transpiration coefficient) was essential for a better match of measured yields (v3).优化的作物特性（最大的粮食产量，N固定指数，热的程度日内，蒸腾系数）为更好地匹配实测产量（第三版）是必不可少