GRE-北美范文4(打印版).pdfVIP

In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the that we humans can truly know only that which we observe. Thus Francis Bacon, who limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and finest formulated the method, might assert that the speaker is fundamentally incorrect. information. How can we reconcile our experience in everyday endeavors with the basic assumption Does recognizing the limits of our knowledge and understanding serve us equally well as underlying the scientific method? Perhaps the answer lies in a distinction between two acquiring new facts and information, as the speaker asserts? While our everyday types of knowledge--one which amounts to a mere collection of observations (i.e., facts experience might lend credence to this assertion, further reflection reveals its and information), the other which is deeper and includes a realization of principles and fundamental inconsistency with our Western view of how we acquire knowledge. truths underlying those observations. At this deeper level knowledge equals Nevertheless, a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the under-standing: how we interpret, make sense of, a nd find meaning in the information two. we collect by way of observation. On the one hand, the speakers assertion accords with the everyday experience of In the final analysis, evaluating the speakers assertion requires that we define working professionals. For example, the sort of book I knowledge that medical, law, and knowledge, which in turn requires that we address complex epistemological issues best business s