Tsai_ APSR_2007_ 连带群体、非正式责任和公共品供给.pdfVIP

Tsai_ APSR_2007_ 连带群体、非正式责任和公共品供给.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Tsai_ APSR_2007_ 连带群体、非正式责任和公共品供给.pdf

American Political Science Review Vol. 101, No. 2 May 2007 DOI: 10.1017.S000座机电话号码70153 Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China LILY L. TSAI Massachusetts Institute of Technology hy would government of?cials in authoritarian and transitional systems where formal demo- cratic and bureaucratic institutions of accountability are often weak ever provide more than Wthe minimum level of public goods needed to maintain social stability? Findings from a unique combination of in-depth case study research and an original survey of 316 villages in rural China indicate that even when formal accountability is weak, local of?cials can be subject to unof?cial rules and norms that establish and enforce their public obligations. These informal institutions of accountability can be provided by encompassing and embedding solidary groups. Villages where these types of groups exist are more likely to have better local governmental public goods provision than villages without these solidary groups, all other things being equal. ormal institutions of accountability are often tal performance and variation in governmental public weak in developing countries Bardhan 2002 . goods provision have focused primarily on the role of FStates in these countries often lack strong bu- strong democratic and bureaucratic institutions. The- reaucratic institutions for controlling corruption and ories of institutional design argue that the key to making sure that lower level of?cials are doing their good government is providing formal democratic in- jobs. Democratic institutions such as elections that al- stitutions and devolving power to local levels so that low citizens to hold local of?cials accountable may citizens can monitor and sanction of?cials effectively be weak and unreliable or even nonexistent. Yet in e.g., Dahl 1971; O’Donnell 1996; Rose-Ackerman these countries som

文档评论(0)

wangshirufeng + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档