口服特比萘芬加外用益康唑短程联合疗法治疗足癣的临床对照研究_临床医学论文.docVIP

口服特比萘芬加外用益康唑短程联合疗法治疗足癣的临床对照研究_临床医学论文.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
口服特比萘芬加外用益康唑短程联合疗法治疗足癣的临床对照研究_临床医学论文.doc

口服特比萘芬加外用益康唑短程联合疗法治疗足癣的临床对照研究_临床医学论文 口服特比萘芬加外用益康唑短程联合疗法治疗足癣的临床对照研究_临床医学论文 作者:杨斌, 杨琴,晏洪波,吴宁,余君贤,李曾三 【摘要】   目的 评价口服特比萘芬片加外用益康唑乳膏短程联合疗法治疗足癣的疗效和安全性。方法 采用随机数字表法将124名患者分为两组:试验组予特比萘芬片250 mg 口服,1次/d,联合益康唑乳膏外用,2次/d,共7 d;对照组予益康唑乳膏外用,2次/d,同时口服维生素C片0.1 g,1次/d,共28 d。于停药时和停药后4周时观察临床疗效和真菌学疗效,停药后4周时观察复发情况。结果 共有113例患者完成临床观察,脱落7例(试验组1例,对照组6例),剔除4例(对照组4例)。停药时两组相比试验组治愈率明显低于对照组(χ2=23.03,P<0.01),有效率及真菌清除率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.33,P>0.05; χ2=0.03,P>0.05);停药后4周时两组相比试验组治愈率、有效率及真菌清除率均显著高于对照组(χ2=17.21,P<0.01; χ2=14.56,P<0.01; χ2=23.03,P<0.01);停药后4周时两组相比试验组复发率明显低于对照组(χ2=14.04,P<0.01);两组不良反应发生率相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.27,P>0.05)。结论 口服特比萘芬片加外用益康唑乳膏短程联合疗法治疗足癣依从性和安全性高、疗效好。 【关键词】 足癣;特比萘芬;联合疗法   Abstract: Objective To study the efficacy and safety of short-term oral administration of terbinafine combined with topical application of econazole in the treatment of tinea pedis.Methods An openlabelled, randomized, controlled and parallel clinical trial was carried out. A total of 124 patients with clinical and mycological diagnosis of tinea pedis were divided into two groups. The trial group was treated with oral terbinafine 250 mg daily, and 1% of econazole ointment twice daily, continuously for 7 days. The control group was treated with 1% of econazole ointment twice daily and oral vitamine C (as placebo) 0.1g daily. Efficacy and safety were compared. Results At the end of treatment, the clinical cure rate of the trial group was significantly lower than that of the control group (χ2 =23.03, 0.01), and there were no significant differences in effective rate and mycological clearance rate between the two groups (χ2=0.33, Pgt;0.05; χ2=0.03, Pgt;0.05). Four weeks later after the end of treatment, the clinical cure rate, the effective rate and the mycological clearance rate of the trial group were significantly higher than that of the control group (χ2=17.21, 0.01; χ2=14.56, 0.01; χ2=23.03, 0.01), and the recurrence rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (χ2=14.04, 0.01). The incidence of adverse event

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

619731806 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档