香港中文大学社会学系.docVIP

香港中文大學社會學系 引用他人著作須知 一九九九年九月 根據香港中文大學本科生手冊（1999: 623, 649），下列各項屬於抄襲行為（plagiarism）： 抄錄已出版或未出版之資料而不加引號，不論逐字抄錄或更易數字（未出版之資料包括同學作業及課堂筆記）； 意譯或摘錄他人著作而不加註明； 借用他人之論點而不加註明； 引述「事實」（人所共知而毋需印証之事實除外）或研究成果而不註明出處。 凡已証實抄襲的同學，除該科不及格外，其學系主任可以因應事情之輕重向有關方面通報，考慮採取下列紀律處分： （甲） 申誡； 在指定期限內，停止享有部分或全部在校權益，及∕或停止使用部分或全部之學校設備； 記過（記過三次者得著令退學）； 著令於指定期限暫行休學；或 開除學籍。 為避免以上處分，敬希各同學小心及適當地引用他人著作。如果遇上不清楚的地方，應即向講師或導師查詢，以免不明不白地犯上抄襲行為。 現舉數例以說明何謂抄襲行為。 逐字抄錄、摘錄、意譯 例一： Peter Berger 在 1991 年版的 Invitation to Sociology 一書中第八十七頁寫道： Where human beings live or work in compact groups, in which they are personally known and to which they are tied by feeling of personal loyalty (the kind that sociologists call primary groups), very potent and simultaneously very subtle mechanisms of control are constantly brought to bear upon the actual or potential deviant. These are the mechanisms of persuasion, ridicule, gossip and opprobrium. 以下是近乎逐字抄錄上文的例子： Social members experience various modes of control exerted over them. Where human beings live or work in compact groups, in which they are personally known and to which they are tied by feeling of personal loyalty (the kind that sociologists call primary groups), very potent and simultaneously very subtle mechanisms of control are constantly brought to bear upon the actual or potential deviant. These are the mechanisms of persuasion, ridicule, gossip and opprobrium. 上文除第一句外，其餘為逐字抄錄原文。逐字抄錄而不加引註，明顯地是抄襲行為，但將原文摘錄，而不加引註，亦算抄襲。以下是摘錄上述原文的例子： Where human beings live or work in primary groups, very potent and subtle mechanisms of control are brought to bear upon the deviant members. These are the mechanisms of persuasion, ridicule and gossip. 就算我們全部或大部分句子都不採用原文文字，甚至連其文法句子結構亦改變，只要採用了原文的意思，如下列句子所示便是意譯。如果不加註釋的話，亦算作抄襲。 In primary groups, in which people knows each other personally, deviants (actual or potential) are restrained by delicate mechanisms of social control, including persuasion, ridicule, gossip, opprobrium, etc. 甚至以中文書寫來意譯英文原文，亦須加上附註。以下句子即屬抄襲行為： 在社會學家稱為初級團體的群體中，越軌者