Architecture de Reacute;seaux RedondantsTravaux Pratiques.ppt

Architecture de Réseaux RedondantsTravaux Pratiques Benoit Lourdelet blourdel@ Agenda HSRP- 1 groupe HSRP- 2 groupes Tracking interface Pre-empt delay Topology Physique Adressage IP Routage HSRP – 1 Router Group Router Groupe impair : actif Router Groupe pair : stanby HSRP – 2 Router Group Routage HSRP – Tracking interface Tracking interface Eth1 Debrancher Eth1 HSRP – Pre-empt delay Tracking interface Eth1 Debrancher Eth1 Rebrancher Eth1 HSRP - configuration * * ? 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. * * ? 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Technologie Router Group impair Technologie Router Group pair Hub Hub PC Group impair PC Group pair Router Internet Technologie Groupe impair : 4/28 Backbone .65 .66 Router fantome 1 HSRP 7 .69 .70 Router fantome 2 HSRP 8 Technologie .70 Default route : 7 Default route : 7 Default route : 54 Default route : 54 Router Group #1 Standby Primary Technologie Router Group #1 Router Group #2 Standby Standby Primary Primary Technologie Technologie .70 Default route : 7 Default route : 8 Router Group #1 Standby Primary Technologie Eth1 Router Group #1 Standby Primary Technologie Eth1 Router2: interface ethernet 0/0 bandwidth 1500 ip address standby 10 priority 150 preempt delay 10 standby 10 ip 54 standby 10 track Ethernet 1 60 Router1: interface ethernet 0/0 bandwidth 128 ip address standby 10 ip 54 standby 10 preempt Technologie About fundamental, why ISP are build like that, this is why ? Prendre du recul How many of you are for ISP Layer upon layer Seems obvious, but the physical routers represented by the virtual router should lead to the same networks. They should be redundant router in parallel. Here, router 2 is the primary because its priority is higher than the default of 100 If S0 fails – since it is being tracked – then the priority drops to 90, making router 1 the primary R1 should probably track S0 as well If S0 comes back on R2, it takes over again after the preempt delay of 10