胃癌新辅助化疗疗效临床评价方法及进展52388.pdfVIP

# 200 # 2010 2 172 C in J Bases Clin General Surg, Vol. 17, No. 2, Feb. 2010 = 1007- 9424(2010)02- 0200- 05 1 2 3 汪劭婷 , 朱朝晖, 李小毅 = , CT EUSMRI PET CT EUS , , ; ( DWI) ; PET , = ; ; ; = R735. 2 = A Advances and Clinical Efficacy Evaluation Method on Neoadjuvant Che otherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer WA N G Shao- ting 1 , ZH U Zhao-h ui 2 , L I X iao-y i 2 . 1 . Ch inese A cademy o M edical S ciences and Peking Union M ed ical Colleg e, B eij ing 100 730 , Ch ina; 2 . PE T Center , Peking Unio n M edical Colleg e, B eij ing 100 730 , Chi- na; 3 . Dep ar tment o B asic S urg ery , Pek ing Union Medical Colleg e , B e ij ing 100730 , China Cor r esp onding A uthor : L I X iao-y i , E-mail : li. x iaoy i@ 263 . net = Abstract Objective To investigate t e advances and clinical efficacy evaluation met od on neoadjuvant c emot erapy in pat ients w it gastric cancer . Methods Literatures on t e advances and clinical efficacy evaluation met od on neoadjuvant c emot erapy in patients w it gastric cancer w ere review ed and analyzed. T e agreement be- tw een computed tomograp y ( CT) , endoscopic ultrasound ( EUS) , magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) and positron em ission tomograp y ( PET) and t e results of istopat ology and survival was analyzed. Results CT and EUS were t e met od of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but t e evaluation indexes and criteria w ere con- troversial, and t e criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasi