Archived File.ppt

Automated Referral Workflow System Proposed Structured Cover Letter IMPAC II interface is critical Structured cover letters Improved machine learning More mechanisms Benefits Reduced referral staff Review meetings 2-3 weeks earlier (or later receipt dates) Acknowledgements Support Office of the Director Extramural Affairs Working Group ARWS Project Team CSR Staff (Dipak Bhattacharyya, Eileen Bradley, Suzanne Fisher, Richard McKay, Richard Panniers, Laura Roman, Kalman Salata, Sean Tate) Discovery Logic (Kirk Barden, Marty Brown, Mike Pollard, Greg Young) IC Staff (Arthur Castle) * Archived File ? ? The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated. See the OER Public Archive Home Page for more details about archived files. ? Automated Referral Workflow System Current Referral Process Automated Referral Workflow System IRG Referral Methods Suggested by Prior Studies 14 Remainder referred by human experts 39 Machine learning predictions when confidence is 80% 47 PI requests electronically mined from letter Percentage of Incoming Applications Referral Basis Automated Referral Workflow System Deployed February 2007 Automated mining of PI requests Referral suggestions based on machine learning Decision support/workflow tool Automated Referral Workflow System Cover Letter Mining -- Approach Fuzzy match to full study section names Exact match to study section acronyms No semantic analysis Automated Referral Workflow System Automated Letter Classifications “High Confidence” “MESH Study Section” “Reduced Confidence” “MI”, “Medical Imaging”, “MI” “No SRG Requests” No acronyms or names found Automated Referral Workflow System Cover Letter Mining Results First electronic new unsolicited R01s (October 2007 Council) 59% of applications included SRG request Only 47% two years ago Automated Referral Workflow System Automated Classification of All Letters 18% No SRG Request 26% Re