速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的成本效果分析.pdfVIP

速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的成本-效果分析  1 1 1* 2 陈斌斌 ，石文文 ，孙利华 ，彭小宸 (1.沈阳药科大学工商管理学院，沈阳 110016 ；2. 贝朗医疗(上海) 国际贸易有限公司， 上海 200131) 摘要：目的 比较速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的经济性。方法 通过文献综述和 meta 分析计算速效救心 丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的有效率；根据发改委、省物价局、卫生系统公布的药品价格和检查价格，计算成本 数据；在此基础上基于全社会的角度进行成本-效果分析。结果 在确定性分析中，速效救心丸组的总成本低于麝香保心 丸组(分别为 384.96 元和 396.70 元) 、治疗有效率高于麝香保心丸组(分别为 88.57%和 87.11%)；针对文献质量、药品价格、 疗程进行敏感性分析，结果基本与确定性分析相一致，但“文献质量”为敏感性因素。结论 速效救心丸治疗冠心病心 绞痛的经济性总体上优于麝香保心丸，但还需深入研究。 关键词：冠心病心绞痛；速效救心丸；麝香保心丸；成本-效果分析 中图分类号：R969.4 文献标志码：B 文章编号：1007-7693(2015)05-0599-04 DOI: 10.13748/ki.issn1007-7693.2015.05.021 Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Suxiao Jiuxin Pill and Shexiang Baoxin Pill for the Treatment of Angina Pectoris 1 1 1* 2 CHEN Binbin , SHI Wenwen , SUN Lihua , PENG Xiaochen (1.School of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China; 2.B.Braun Medical (Shanghai) Int’l Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200131, China) ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE To compare the economy of Suxiao Jiuxin pill and Shexiang Baoxin pill in treatment of angina pectoris. METHODS According to the literature review and meta-analysis to calculate the effective rate of Suxiao Jiuxin pill and Shexiang Baoxin pill; and then combine the price from the National Development and Reform Commission, Commodity Prices, health system to perform cost-effectiveness analysis from a social prospective. RESULTS The deterministic study showed that the cost of Suxiao Jiuxin pill was lower than Shexiang Baoxin pill (¥384.96 vs ¥396.70), and the effective rate of Suxiao Jiuxin pill was higher than Shexiang Baoxin pill(88.57% vs 87.11%). Sensitivity analysis was robust but the quality of literature was a sensitive factor. CONCLU