argument,模板 .doc

Argument At first glance, it seems reasonable that ** ; however, close scrutiny of the evidence reveals that the argument actually suffers from several critical flaws. the reliability of the survey is questionable. (the argument is fraught with vague and unwarranted assumptions.) the argument mistakenly assumes a correlation amounts to a causal relationship. the comparison in this argument is incomplete and selective. the arguer fails to consider alternative explanations in the analysis. The flaws above would be discussed respectively. 调查的可信性 In the first place, the survey/study/poll is not persuasive. (调查方法) For one thing, if the questions were misleading or if the survey is based on self reports, the results might be unreliable . For one thing, if the questions were misleading, then the results might not reflect the actual opinions/ideas of the respondents and thus be unreliable.or if the survey is based on self reports, the result might be unreliable since (the employers/ chemists may deliberately exaggerate the effects of their products/foods, conceal the shortcomings/ harms/ limitations of their products/foods to gain more economical benefits. (数量) the arguer fails to mention how board the survey is. If the survey was limited to inadequate respondents, the results might only represent the particular (conditions), and the generalization would not be applicable to (other conditions/places). The data of the survey is only from (500 people), which is not a particularly large number, thus it is entirely possible that the results might only represent the particular (conditions), and the generalization would not be applicable to (other conditions/places) (采样)For another thing, perhaps the respondents are all those who live in a certain city or geographic region, all those who are keen on the taste of the food/( familiar with the music), all those who spontaneously take daily exercises. If so, the respondents can not represent the overall group of people who ***. T