TEM4_2011_作文试卷评析.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共41页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
TEM4_2011_作文试卷评析.ppt

该篇作文第一段写得还可以。 前面的general statement 交代了背景,政府有关机构正在研究向私家车征收污染费的可能性,这一举动引发了民众争议,有支持,有反对。 接着,从“As far as I am concerned”开始的thesis statement阐述了作文作者的观点:私车主应该交污染费,但是要“properly”。我们期待后面的讨论会指出如何“properly”。 第一部分: ?Recently the government agencies in some big cities have been doing research on the possibility of putting a “pollution tax” on private cars. This has resulted in a great stir among the public. Some people hold the opinion that it is an effective way to control the number of cars and reduce the amount of pollution in the city, but others don’t think so. As far as I’m concerned, private car owners should be properly taxed for pollution. 英语专业四级考试在线课堂 第二部分的写作 议论文第二部分的写作要注意: 结构严谨,条理清楚; 论证严密,论据妥当。 写作的时候要尽量做到紧扣论点进行分析讨论,表述要有逻辑性。 英语专业四级考试在线课堂 The following two reasons are used to support my point of view. On one hand, as well known to us, our surrounding is seriously polluted especially by car pollution. Therefore, “pollution tax” on private car can effectively remind us of the severely pollution. Then the number of cars and pollution in the city can be reduced in some way. On the other hand, we know that we are facing the resource crisis. However, more private cars will use up more gas or other resources. So if we tax private car owners for pollution, we can decrease the use of resources and then protect the environment from pollution indirectly. 要讨论的观点应该在第一段的Thesis statement 里交代清楚,第二段主要是论证,但是作文作者继续讨论背景,论证不严密,结构松散不够紧凑。 第一个论点模糊,论据交代不清楚,直接得出结论: Therefore, “pollution tax” on private car can effectively remind us of the severely pollution.Then the number of cars and pollution in the city can be reduced in some way. 第二个论点转到资源危机方面,认为征税可以减少资源利用,从而间接保护环境不被污染。论据说服力不够。 对Thesis statement提出的“properly”征税没有任何讨论和表述。 英语专业四级考试在线课堂 结尾 In conclusion, I think that private car owners should be properly taxed for pollution. It is not only for punishment but also for warning. “Pollution tax” on private cars is an effective way to control the number of cars, reduce pollution

文档评论(0)

docindpp + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档