反对强迫自证其罪规则和研究.pdf

摘 要 摘 要 联合国《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第 14 条第 3 款（庚）项规定：在刑事诉 讼中，人们“不得被强迫作不利于他自己的证言或强迫承认有罪”。这一表述，被称为 反对强迫自证其罪。目前，国际上将反对强迫自证其罪规则视为刑事诉讼中对被追诉人 进行公正审判的一项最低限度保障。 反对强迫自证其罪的历史可以追溯到十七世纪。自其产生以后，在不少国家得到尊 重和确立。随着国际人权事业的发展以及对人权保护的关注，反对强迫自证其罪规则不 仅为更多的国际公约所认可，而且许多国家的国内法也将其纳入立法的范畴，相应地设 立了一些制度以保障该原则的实施。随着社会的发展，这一原则的内涵在不断发生变化， 其适用的范围、应用的具体制度也与最初的产生有所不同。但是，作为一项公认的国际 法规则，它的地位是十分稳固的。 然而，令人困惑的是，不得强迫自证其罪被视为是一项充满例外和蕴涵着许多法律 难题的规则，人们对此有着不少的争议。尤其在我国，该规则在刑事诉讼法或有关证据 规定当中并未明确。本文试图通过对反对强迫自证其罪规则产生和发展的历史回顾，深 入研究这一规则产生和存在的理论依据，全面考察这一规则的适用情况，以及我国在刑 事诉讼法中如何明确确立和完善该规则。 关键词：强迫自证其罪 理论基础 保障性措施 I Abstract Abstract UN quot;international covenant on civil and political rights,quot; Article 14, paragraph 3 (g) provides: In criminal proceedings, it quot;shall not be compelled to testify against his own testimony or to confess guilt.quot; This expression is called against self-incrimination.Currently, international general rules against forced self-incrimination as criminal proceedings against the Defendant a fair trial of a minimum guarantee. Against self-incrimination, dates back to the seventeenth century. Since its produced, in many countries are respected and established.With the development of international human rights and protection concerns for human rights, against forced self-incrimination not only the international conventions for the more recognized and that the domestic law of many countries will also be incorporated into legislation its scope accordingly established a number of system to ensure the implementation of th