论中国行政自由裁量权的控制.pdfVIP

  • 8
  • 0
  • 约4.08万字
  • 约 39页
  • 2015-11-01 发布于安徽
  • 举报
摘 要 摘 要 现代社会,行政自由裁量权的存在与发展已成为必然,行政自由裁量权作为行政权 的重要组成部分,历来受到行政法学界的高度重视。如何在赋予行政主体必要充分的自 由裁量权的同时,而又避免其滥用这种权力,是依法行政的重点。现代行政法就是在行 政自由裁量权的不断扩张与对行政自由裁量权的控制不断加强的进程中得到完善和发 展的。为了提高行政效率,以适应现代行政管理的要求,实现依法行政的目标,保证行 政自由裁量权的合理运用必须对行政自由裁量权进行控制,由于任何一种单一的治理方 式都有其自身难以克服的弱点,任何单一的监督方式都不可能达到最优效果。因而,从 立法、行政和司法等多方面对行政自由裁量权进行多元化的控制才是最有效的途径。 本文从行政自由裁量权的概述入手,论述了两大法系对行政自由裁量权的控制及对 我国的启示,分析了我国行政自由裁量权的控制现状,在此基础上提出了对我国由立法 控制、行政控制、司法控制组成的多元控制体系的完善,以求有助于我国加强依法行政, 使行政自由裁量权更好地服务于现代化建设。 关键词 行政自由裁量权 现状 多元控制 I Abstract Abstract In modern society, the existence of administrative discretion and development have become a necessity, administrative discretion as an important part of the executive power, has always been highly valued by the administrative law scholars. How to give necessary and sufficient administrative body discretion, while yet to avoid the abuse of such power is the focus of administration according to law. Modern administrative law is to administrative discretion in the continuous expansion and on the control of administrative discretion been continuously strengthen the process of improvement and development. In order to improve administrative efficiency, to meet the requirements of modern administration, to achieve the goal of administration by law, to ensure the reasonable administrative discretion must be used to control administrative discretion, because any single form of governance has its own difficult to overcome weaknesses, no single mode of supervision can not achieve optimal results. Thus, from the legislative, executive and judicial and other aspects of administrative discretion to a wide range of control is the most effective wa

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档