关于我国民事诉讼管辖权异议制度的完善.pdfVIP

摘 要 管辖作为民事诉讼的首要环节，通过对纠纷的分配来使法院审判权得到具体的 落实。根据现行民事诉讼法的规定，当事人有权对民事纠纷的管辖归属向受诉法院 提出自己的不同意见，这就是一般意义上的管辖权异议。作为一项救济制度，管辖 权异议是实现当事人实体权利的程序保障之一，它体现了当事人诉权的平等，有利 于保障法院正确行使管辖权，同时对地方保护也能起到一定的遏制作用。其完善与 否很大程度影响着诉讼当事人实体权利的实现，意义十分重大。然而我国民事诉讼 法对管辖权异议的规定过于抽象，司法解释亦不甚严密和周详，在制度设计上存在 缺陷，具体表现为管辖权异议的提起条件尚待进一步明确，管辖权异议处理程序设 计存在法律漏洞等。由此造成的直接后果是实践操作中适法的不一和混乱，从而危 及诉讼过程和结果的公正。本文笔者立足于自身在立案庭和审判监督庭工作实践， 在重新梳理学界的研究成果的同时，力图从制度功能、提起条件和审查程序三个方 面重新构想完善我国管辖权异议制度的具体路径，期望能够提出一套既适应我国现 行司法体制，又能有效解决现行司法实践所存在问题的具体方案。 关键词：民事诉讼；管辖权异议；提起条件；处理程序 I Abstract The jurisdiction took the civil action the most important link, through causes the court judicial authority obtains when the concrete realization to the dispute assignment. According to the present civil procedure law stipulation, the litigant is authorized to the civil dispute jurisdiction ownership to receive sues the court to propose own different opinion, this is in the general sense jurisdiction objection. As a relief system, the jurisdiction objection realizes one of litigant entity right procedure safeguards, it has manifested the litigant right of suit equality, is advantageous in safeguards the court to exercise the jurisdiction correctly, simultaneously also can play certain containment role to the place protection. Its consummation or not very great degree is affecting the lawsuit litigant entity right realization, The significance is extremely significant. However our country civil procedure law too is abstract to the jurisdiction objection stipulation, the judicial interpretation not really is also stri ct and is minute, in the system de