enabling e-research in combustion research community.pptVIP

Community Data Evaluation using a Semantically Enhanced Modelling Process e-mail: mhh@comp.leeds.ac.uk , Mohammed Haji 1, Peter Dew 1, Chris Martin 1,2 1 School of Computing, University of Leeds 2 School of Chemistry, University of Leeds * Content Community Data Evaluation using a Semantically Enhanced Modelling Process Capturing Provenance and Data Current practices and the Electronic Lab Notebook Evaluation Conclusion * Community Data Evaluation The Motivation Study how to transition from todays ad-hoc process practises Sustainable process of Gathering, community evaluation and sharing data models between scientists Minimising changes to proven working practises of the scientist Operate within world-wide co-laboratories Progress in many scientific communities depends on complementary experimental and theoretical development. These communities require high quality data to evaluate findings. - Our primary community is the Atmospheric Community . * Capturing Provenance Data Provenance is captured in three forms namely Inline (during the experiment execution), pre-hoc and post-hoc, before and after the experiment. Broadly speaking there are two categories for capturing provenance data in e-Science projects: System oriented: There are usually tightly coupled with the workflow paradigm and seek to automatically capture provenance. User oriented: Adopting key practises from the scientific approach and use domain specific scientific terminologies. In this research we seek to develop a user oriented approach and reconcile with the system orientation to automate process provenance capture. Specifically capturing inline annotation. * Current Evaluation Processes for the MCM * Envisioned Evaluation Processes * ELN Process * Prompts displayed when changing the chemical mechanism; Editing a reaction Adding a new reaction ELN Screenshots * Evaluation Methodology In-depth interviews with members of the atmospheric chemistry model group at Leeds, covering