pirus 2 creating a common standard for measuring online usage.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约1.15万字
约 21页
2016-03-05 发布于广东
举报
版权申诉

pirus 2 creating a common standard for measuring online usage.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

pirus 2 creating a common standard for measuring online usage

New usage-based measures of impact in the context of altmetrics- Article Level Reporting and the Usage Factor Peter Shepherd COUNTER June 2014 Altmetrics: the context ‘No-one can read everything. We rely on filters to make sense of the scholarly literature, but the narrow, traditional filters are being swamped… …the growth of new, online scholarly tools allows us to make new filters: these altmetrics reflect the broad, rapid impact of scholarship in this burgeoning ecosystem. We call for more tools and research based on altmetrics.’ From Altmetrics: a manifesto Jason Priem at al (/manifesto/ ) Filters for the scholarly literature: Citations Peer Review Usage Altmetrics Altmetrics: what are they? Altmetrics: what are they?? Based on a range of measures, including: bookmarks, links, tweets (tweeted half-life!?), Facebook, blog posts and other measures that indicate ways that readers have been influenced by a publication Reflect the fact that scholars are moving their everyday work to the web (( e.g. Mendeley, Zotero) Cover newer forms of publishing, such as datasets, blogging, ‘nanopublication’, as well as traditional articles Take into account the wider impact of research, e.g. by measuring activity in social media Reflect the ‘ongoing conversation’ around the outputs of scientific research Tend to focus on individual articles and other research outputs rather than on journals Altmetrics: pros and cons Pros, Cover all fields of scholarship and all types of publication Take into account activity in social media More immediate measure of impact than citations – ‘real time’ Scholar and item based rather than journal-based Go beyond counting and emphasis semantic content, e.g. usernames and timestamps Cons: What do the numbers mean? Do they reflect impact or buzz? Less direct link to research quality Easier to manipulate and less transparent than citation data No widely accepted standards or benchmarks. Do 20 tweets = 1 Mendeley upload? Can be gamed