MARX’S ECONOMIC THEORY TRUE OR FALSE A MARXIAN RESPONSE TO.pdf

MARX’S ECONOMIC THEORY TRUE OR FALSE A MARXIAN RESPONSE TO.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共42页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
MARX’S ECONOMIC THEORY: TRUE OR FALSE? A MARXIAN RESPONSE TO BLAUG’S APPRAISAL by Fred Moseley Department of Economics Mount Holyoke College South Hadley MA 01075 E-mail: fmoseley@mhc.mtholyoke.edu December 1997 Presented at the 25th Encontro Nacional de Economia of ANPEC, December 11, 1997, Recife Brazil. 1 Abstract MARX’S ECONOMIC THEORY: TRUE OR FALSE? A MARXIAN RESPONSE TO BLAUG’S APPRAISAL by Fred Moseley Mark Blaug has recently presented a very negative appraisal of the empirical validity of Marx’s economic theory: Blaug concludes that Marx’s theory has been glaringly refuted by the empirical evidence of the last century. This paper presents a Marxian response to Blaug’s negative appraisal of Marx’s theory. The paper reexamines in detail Blaug’s empirical evidence and other related evidence with respect to the following conclusions: the falling rate of profit, the impoverishment of workers, conflict over the length of the working day, conflict over the intensity of labor, recurring depressions, increasing concentration of capital, proletarianization of the labor force, and the necessity of money. The paper comes to essentially the opposite conclusion as Blaug: that Marx’s theory is largely consistent with the empirical evidence and has an impressive range of explanatory power. Brief remarks are also made about the relative explanatory power of Marx’s theory and neoclassical economic theory. 2 MARX’S ECONOMIC THEORY: TRUE OR FALSE? A MARXIAN RESPONSE TO BLAUG’S

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档