- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微观金融技术与方法 第一章 偏好表示与风险厌恶 1.1 引言 期望效用理论全面考虑了投资收益的风险和收益的概率分布情况,是研究不确定环境下个体消费和投资决策的主要工具。 风险厌恶型投资者的投资行为 本章主要建立期望效用理论的基础,和资产定价理论的微观经济基础。 对待风险的态度 风险厌恶的度量 两基金货币分离 1.2 一些常用的投资决策准则 一、 收益最大准则 收益最大准则应用于完全没有风险的情况下。由此法则,只需选择收益率最高的投资机会即可。经济学中的生产者理论和价值理论广泛使用这一准则。 在金融经济学中,不确定环境下,收益最大准则不再适用。 二、 最大期望收益准则 使用投资收益的期望值作为各种投资方案的比较,是收益最大准则在不确定情形下的推广。 是否期望收益最大准则就是一个最优的决策法则呢?(否) Example 1 Gamble (X) flip of a coin if heads, you receive $1: X1 = +1 if tails, you pay $1: X2 = -1 E(X) = (0.5) (1) + (0.5) (-1) = 0 if you play this game many times, it is unlikely that you will win or lose anything Example 2 Gamble (X) flip of a coin if heads, you receive $10: X1 = +10 if tails, you pay $1: X2 = -1 E(X) = (0.5) (10) + (0.5) (-1) = 4.50 if you play this game many times, you will be a big winner How much would you pay to play this game: perhaps as much as a $4.50 But of course the answer depends upon your preference to risk Fair Gambles if the cost to play = expected value of these gambles the outcome then the gamble is said to be actuarially fair Common empirical findings: 1. individuals may agree to flip a coin for small amounts of money, but usually refuse to bet large sums of money ? 2. people will pay small amounts of money to play actuarially unfair games (for example, cost = $1, but E(X) 1) - but will avoid paying a lot Why do these empirical findings occur? 圣彼得堡悖论(Saint Petersburg paradox) Gamble (X): A coin is flipped until a head appears, You receive $2n , where n is the flip on which the head occurred states: X1 = $2 X2 = $4 X3 = $8 ... Xn = $2n prob: α1 = 1/2 α2 = 1/4 α3 = 1/8 ... αn = 1/2n ? ? E(X) = ? Paradox: no one would pay an actuarially fair price to play this game (no one would even pay close to the fair price) Explaining the St. Petersburg Paradox this paradox arises because individuals do not make decisions based on purely on their wealth, but rather on the utility of their
文档评论(0)