8.15已经修改。LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎患者的临床效果对比.doc

LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎患者的临床效果对比 赵雨花 （常熟市第二人民医院 江苏常熟 215500） 摘要：目的：对比LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床效果。方法：选取2013年10月到2015年4月期间，到我院就诊的70例慢性宫颈炎患者为研究对象，在取得患者同意的前提下，随机将患者均分为对照组（采用微波治疗）和观察组（采用LEEP刀治疗），两组患者的人数均为35例，观察并比较两组患者的手术情况、治疗效果等指标。结果： ①观察组患者的手术时间、阴道流液时间、术中出血量均优于对照组，两组差异显著（P＜0.05）；②观察组患者的治疗总有效率为97.14％（34/35），对照组为82.86％（29/35），两组差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 在慢性宫颈炎的治疗中，与传统微波治疗相比，LEEP刀治疗的效果更佳，值得临床推广。（代写未结算稿酬） 关键词：慢性宫颈炎；微波治疗；LEEP刀 LEEP knife and the clinical effect of microwave treatment of chronic cervicitis patients Zhaoyuhua （The second peoples hospital of changshu，Jiangsu changshu，Abstract: objective: to compare the LEEP knife and the clinical effect of microwave treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods: selected during October 2013 to April 2013, to our hospital 70 cases of chronic cervicitis patients as the research object, under the premise that the consent of the patients, patients were randomly divided into control group (by microwave treatment) and observation group (treated by LEEP knife), the number of two groups of patients are 35 cases, observe and compare the situation of surgery in two groups of patients, treatment effect and so on.Results: (1) observation group of patients with operation time, bleeding amount of vaginal discharge time, were superior to control group, significant difference was found in two groups (P 0.05); (2) the treatment of patients with observation group total effective rate was 97.14% (34/35), the control group was 82.86% (29/35), significant difference was found in two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion：in the treatment of chronic cervicitis, compared with the traditional microwave treatment, the effect of LEEP knife treatment is better, worthy of clinical promotion. Key words: chronic cervicitis; Microwave treatment; LEEP knife 关闭全屏阅读 慢性宫颈炎在临床上较为常见，属于一种妇科疾病，多发于育龄期女性，属于诱发宫颈癌的高危因素之一。慢性宫颈炎包含多种病变，比如宫颈糜烂、宫颈肥大等。在临床治疗中，以局部治疗为主，主要有物理治疗（比如激光、冷冻、微波等）、手术治疗、药物治疗[1]。据临床资料显示，若患者未得到及时、有效的治疗，其发生恶化的几率显著高于正常组织[2]。我院特选取2013年10月至2015年4月间收治的70例慢性宫颈炎患者进行临床研究，探讨LEEP刀与微博治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床效果，现报