对上海市钓鱼执法案的法律分析_论文.docVIP

 内容摘要 全国各地连续发生的“钓鱼执法”案件将我国行政机关在行政执法上的问题显露无 疑。本文以上海市的两起具有代表性的案件作为文章选取案件进行分析，本文由案件发 生情况的介绍及案情争议焦点的提出、刑事诱惑侦查手段能否运用于行政执法活动、行 政证据的合法性、非法营运的认定这四部分组成。第一部分阐述案件当时发生的具体情 况，引出了与案件事实联系紧密的争议焦点，如:案件中刑事诱惑侦查的手段能否运用 到行政执法中来？作出具体行政行为所依据的证据是否具有合法性?执法机关对非法营 运的认定是否妥当和具有法律依据?文章第二部分则开始结合案情针对本文所提出的第 一个争议焦点进行法律分析。首先，文章专门解释了案件中频繁出现的“钓鱼执法”这 一词语的法律概念，说明“钓鱼执法”其实是诱惑侦查的另一种说法。随后文章对刑事 诱惑侦查的分类进行阐述，紧接着对“犯意诱发型”诱惑侦查手段在我国行政执法中运 用的违法性理由进行阐述。第三部分基于“钓鱼执法”所获得的行政证据的合法性进行 较为详细的分析。第四部分讨论了本案是否属于非法营运的认定问题。 本文以具有代表性的上海市钓鱼执法案件作为案例进行分析，找出案例中的争议焦 点，进而陈述案件的法理分析，接着针对案件进行案件分析，已期为达到完善制度，根 除钓鱼执法中的弊病，提高执法人员的执法水平，为行政执法工作开创新的局面提供借 鉴性的参考。 关键词：“钓鱼执法”；诱惑侦查；证据合法性；非法营运 1 Abstract Many problems about the administrative law enforcement of our country were exposed in two “fishing law enforcement” cases happened in Shanghai. In this paper, two representative cases of Shanghai are selected for analyzing. This article is composed of four chapters. Involved, the narration of the cases and the problems involved, temptation criminal investigative techniques can be applied in administrative enforcement activities, legality of the evidence of administrative, identify illegal transportations. The first section describes the circumstances surrounding the case, leading to the focus of controversy closely associated with the case. Such as, can the means of temptation investigation in criminal be applied to the administrative enforcement in the case? if the evidence made on the basis of the specific administrative act is legitimate? whether the identification of illegal transportations is reasonable and has a legal basis? The second part, mading the legal analysis of the first focus of controversy surrounding disputes previously proposed. First, to clear the legal concept of multiple occurrences of the word , “fishing law enforcement”. That, the “fishing law enforcement” is another saying of temptation investigation. Subsequently, elaborating the classifications of criminal investigation on temptation, then, elaborating the illegal reasons o