emerald管理学资源获取国际期刊投稿指南-郑州大学图书馆.pptVIP

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * 论文准备 - 在线提交系统ScholarOne 论文评审状态示例: 论文审稿流程 审稿方式：两轮同行双盲评审 审稿周期： 从提交到收到初次反馈: 3~3.5个月 发表周期: 3个月、1年不等 审稿结果： 拒绝— 选题问题，改投其他期刊 修改—根据评审意见进行修改、意见不同之处积极 与主编沟通 再次提交：修改时间，随附修改Notes 修改说明-Revision Notes Better grounding of the problem. Parts of the front-end of the paper read like a tutorial-like introduction of action research. In a rewrite, there are two things that I would like to see instead. I would expect a clearer attempt to establish the research-practice gap as an intellectual challenge. This is the main theme of the paper and it would therefore be useful to substantiate your understanding of this gap beyond the surface level. Next comment You imply that you do not wish to see a tutorial to CAR (even though one reviewer thinks that this is needed since some sections of the MISQ readership may not be familiar with CAR). We concur with you and have removed the tutorial aspects. The front end of the paper (pages 2-5) has been revised in order to outline the research and practical problems that we focused on. We agree that the research-practice gap needs to be positioned clearly as an intellectual challenge (as highlighted on page 3). We have now deliberately positioned the paper in this way with the challenge manifested in the action-research dichotomy, where either action or research tends to be the focus of action research projects (as explained on page 3). We also substantiate our arguments better in the broader CAR literature (as detailed from pages 5-14). Next response 1 2 3 Ref # Reviewer Comment Author Response 期刊稿件评审流程 论文发表-Author packs 所有期刊电子版 3个月免费访问权 Literati network 评奖 Tips 无版面费、无审稿费 撰写正文前，可先向主编提交大纲或摘要，节省双方时间 英语语言很重要，合作作者、第三者评审 获取文中非原创文字、图标或图片的相关版权许可 文中表格需要单独文档提交 供作者参考其他资源() 作者专栏 学者园地 中国作者常见现象 不严格遵守投稿指南，如字数超限等 Solution：仔细阅读每本期刊的Author Guideline 论文内容与期刊内容方向不符 Solution：投稿前先将摘要发给期刊主编，如方向不符，另择期刊投稿 英语语法、词句错误较多 Solution：寻求合作作者或专业的第三方做proofreading 文章缺乏创新性，有抄袭（plagiarism)现象 Solution： 论文完成