模拟放射性含硼废液的水泥固化研究.docVIP

模拟放射性含硼废液的水泥固化研究 孙奇娜1,*，2，2 1燕山大学环境与化学工程学院，， 2清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院，北京，100084 *Email: sunqn@ysu.edu.cn 为了比较硫铝酸盐水泥（SAC）和普通硅酸盐水泥（OPC）对含硼放射性废液的固化，为配方优化提供依据，本文采用两种配方对模拟放射性含硼废液进行了水泥固化，测定了固化体28d抗压强度及抗浸泡性、抗冻融性、耐γ辐照试验后的强度损失，进行了模拟核素浸出试验，并对固化体水化产物进行了XRD分析。结果表明，两种配方可有效固化模拟含硼废液，固化体28d抗压强度、各项试验强度损失和模拟核素浸出率均满足GB14569.1-1993的要求，试验所用的硫铝酸盐水泥配方对Cs+的滞留能力优于普通硅酸盐水泥配方，固化体中的硼以B(OH)4-形式固溶在钙矾石中。 Fig. 1 Leaching rate of Sr2+, Cs+ and Co2+ 关键词：水泥固化；含硼废液；抗压强度；浸出试验；钙矾石 Study on Cementation of Simulated Radioactive Borated Liquid Wastes Qina Sun 1,*, Jianlong Wang 2, Junfeng Li 2 1College of Environment and Chemistry Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004 2Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 To compare sulfoaluminate cement with ordinary Portland cement on their cementation of radioactive borated liquid waste and to provide more data for formula optimization, simulated radioactive borated liquid waste were solidified by the two cements. The study investigated 28d compressive strength and strength losses after water/freezing/irradiation resistance tests. Leaching test and X-ray diffraction analysis were also conducted. The results showed that it was feasible to solidify borated liquid wastes with sulfoaluminate cement and ordinary Portland cement with formulas used in the study. The 28d compressive strengths, strength losses after tests and simulated nuclides leaching rates of the solidified waste forms met the demand of GB 14569.1-1993. The sulfoaluminate cement formula showed better retention of Cs+ than ordinary Portland cement formula. Boron, in form of B(OH)4-, incorporated in ettringite as solid solutions.