韩素音翻译大赛.pptVIP

It’s Time to Rethink ‘Temporary’ 是时候重新思考建筑业的“衰退” We tend to view architecture as permanent, as aspiring to the status of monuments. And that kind of architecture has its place. But so does architecture of a different sort.我们倾向于把建筑业看作是亘古不变的，正如渴望英雄永垂不朽。无可厚非，一些建筑物有他自己的风格，也有其独具一格的一面。 For most of the first decade of the 2000s, architecture was about the statement building. Whether it was a controversial memorial or an impossibly luxurious condo tower, architecture’s raison d’être was to make a lasting impression. Architecture has always been synonymous with permanence, but should it be?21世纪第一个十年里的很多时期，建筑物的风格是关于声明大楼。无论它是一个有争议的纪念碑，还是一个不可思议的豪华公寓塔，建筑物存在的原因就是为了给世人留下一个持久的印象。建筑物似乎总是永久的代名词，然而应该是么？ In the last few years, the opposite may be true. Architectural billings are at an all-time low. Major commissions are few and far between. The architecture that’s been making news is fast and fleeting: pop-up shops, food carts, marketplaces, performance spaces. And while many manifestations of the genre have jumped the shark (i.e., a Toys R Us pop-up shop), there is undeniable opportunity in the temporary: it is an apt response to a civilization in flux. And like many prevailing trends — collaborative consumption (a.k.a., “sharing”), community gardens, barter and trade — “temporary” is so retro that it’s become radical.在过去的几年里，一些认为建筑业是短暂流行的观点也许是真的。因为与建筑业有关的开销创下历史新低。一些重要的委托任务更是少之又少。与建筑业有关的活动一直是以迅雷不及掩耳之势出现。如弹出式商店，食品车，商场，表演场所等。然而，这种建筑物风格的表现已经不再吸引人了。（例如，一家美国著名玩具公司“玩具反斗城弹出店”），影响其衰退的因素难以避免：在文明交替中，它是一个恰当的反应。同时，正如许多正在流行的趋势—合作性消费观（亦称，“共享”），社区花园，易货和贸易—“衰退”现象重新流行，进而变得极端。 In November, I had the pleasure of moderating Motopia, a panel at University of Southern California’s School of Architecture, with Robert Kronenburg, an architect, professor at University of Liverpool and portable/temporary/mobile guru. Author of a shelf full of books on the topic, including “Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change,” “Portable Architecture: Design and Technology” and “Houses in Motion: The Genesis