正畸医师与普通人对尖牙替代上颌侧切牙患者微笑的审美差异分析.docVIP

正畸医师与普通人对尖牙替代上颌侧切牙患者微笑的审美差异分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
正畸医师与普通人对尖牙替代上颌侧切牙患者微笑的审美差异分析.doc

正畸医师与普通人对尖牙替代上颌侧切牙患者微笑的审美差异分析   [摘要]目的:比较正畸医师与普通人对尖牙替代上颌侧切牙正畸治疗和正常完整牙列者的微笑审美差异。方法:选取以尖牙替代上颌侧切牙进行矫治的患者25例,分为两组,即单侧组(单侧尖牙替代)10例和双侧组(双侧尖牙替代)15例。选取完整牙列者20例为对照组。拍摄患者治疗后面下1/3微笑像,由正畸医师和普通人两组用VAS方法评价每一张微笑像吸引人的程度。结果:正畸医师与普通人对单侧尖牙替代患者的微笑美学评价有统计学差异(P0.05),正畸医师比普通人评分低;两者对双侧组和对照组的评价无统计学差异。正畸医师对单侧尖牙替代患者微笑美学评价低于双侧组和对照组,有统计学差异(P0.05),而对双侧组和对照组的评价无统计学差异;普通人对3组的评价均无统计学差异。结论:正畸医师对单侧尖牙替代患者微笑的美学评价低于正常完整牙列者,而普通人的评价没有差异。双侧尖牙替代患者微笑吸引力与正常完整牙列者无显著差异。   [关键词]微笑;上颌侧切牙畸形;尖牙替代   [中图分类号]R783.5 [文献标志码]A [文章编号]1008-6455(2015)12-0076-03   Smile attractiveness of canine substitution in cases with maxillary lateral incisors agenesis as rated by orthodontists and laypersons   WEI Jian-ping,MA Jia-jun,ZHANG Xi-zhong   (Department of Orthodontics,Tianjin Stomatological Hospital,Tianjin 300041, China)   Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the smile attractiveness of canine substitution in cases with maxillary lateral incisors agenesis compared with that of individuals with a complete dentition as rated by orthodontists and laypersons. Methods Smiling photographs were made of patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis who were treated with unilateral canine substitution (n=10) or bilateral canine substitution (n=15) and a control group with a complete dentition (n=20).The images of the smile were judged by orthodontists and laypersons, using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results Attractiveness ratings by orthodontists and laypersons differed significantly in unilateral canine substitution group, but no significant differences were found in bilateral canine substitution group and the control group. The orthodontists,ratings of unilateral canine substitution group were significantly lower than the other two groups.The laypersons,ratings did not differ significantly among the three groups. Conclusion The smile of patients treated with unilateral canine substitution was judged less attractive than that of controls in orthodontists,but the same attractive in layperson

文档评论(0)

kaku + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8124126005000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档