LDBM242010.docVIP

LDBM 24/2010 香港特別行政區 土地審裁處 建築物管理申請編號2010年第24宗 HUNG SEK PAN 第一申請人 TEO KAM MEI 第二申請人 及 黃伯昌 第一答辯人 冼佩莉 第二答辯人 主審法官 : 土地審裁處暫委法官黃健棠 審訊日期 : 2011年4月14日 判案日期 : 2011年4月14日 _______________ 判 案 書 _______________ 引言 1. 涉案大廈兩個上、下層單位的業主，為浴室滲水問題訴諸本審裁處。 背景 2. 兩名申請人為香港北角英皇道275號南天大廈13/F E室單位業主；而兩名答辯人則是下層12/F E室單位業主。 3. 約在2008年初，申請人等發現單位天花有滲水情況，於是聯絡不同的政府部門跟進事情。 2008年9月24日，屋宇署/食物環境衛生署委託李麥建築師測量師行有限公司進行調查及測試，並准備報告，結果顯示。 “Section D – Conclusion and recommendation 1 Source of water seepage : ( Source established Reversible Pressure Test was conducted on 10/9/08. Moisture Content was remaining high before turn off water mater. The MC values at check points were dropped at value from around 30 ~ 40. After release the water pressure, the MC values at check points were increase gradually. Positive result was noted from Reversible Pressure Test. The source is likely to be water supply pipe leakage. ( Uncertain 2 Follow up action: ( Advisory letter to the occupier of the suspected premises persuading further investigation voluntarily as the source cannot be ascertain and full reply to the complainant accordingly (Suspected premises:) ( Advisory letter to the liable party to abate the seepage nuisance and carry out rectification and enforcement action under s127 of PH MSO to follow (Liable premises: Room E, 13/F, Nam Tin Building, No. 275 King’s Road, North Point; and Source of seepage: Defective water supply pipe) ( Refer the case to WSD for follow up under WO as the source is highly suspected to water supply pipe leakage at ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ( Refer the case to BD for follow up action as it may warrant statutory enforcement action under s24/ s26/ s28 of BO. ( Others:??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 其後，個案轉交水務署跟進，不過，2008年11月10日，水務署回覆: “您向屋宇署/食物環境衛生署聯合辦