Panel Discussion on the Differences and Similarities of Wired vs.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约9.5千字
约 33页
2016-10-07 发布于重庆
举报
版权申诉

Panel Discussion on the Differences and Similarities of Wired vs.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Panel Discussion on the Differences and Similarities of Wired vs

OpenSig 2003:Panel Discussion on the Differences and Similarities of Wired vs. Wireless Security Russ Housley 9 October 2003 Ethernet vs. 802.11 Wireless LAN Do Ethernet and 802.11 WLANs offer the same services? From a protocol stack perspective, Ethernet and WLANs are largely interchangeable. Both allow the application layer protocols to deliver the expected services. From a security perspective, they are quite different. Wired Guest Network Example With WLANs … (1 of 3) With WLANs … (2 of 3) With WLANs … (3 of 3) Security Services Mechanisms for confidentiality, integrity, and authentication are essential for any WLAN to offer comparable security to an Ethernet. WLAN Frame Security All currently deployed IEEE 802.11 WLAN devices have flawed security WEP data encryption easy to break IEEE 802.11 authentication easy to subvert IEEE 802.11 security solution has two phases: Short-term security solution called TKIP Accommodates existing hardware Firmware and driver upgrade Long-term security solution called CCMP (uses AES) Targeted at new hardware designs WEP Description RC4 is a Stream Cipher IV Collisions WEP expands the RC4 Base Key into 224 per-packet keys Data can be recovered if IV is ever repeated with same per-packet key RC4 key must be changed at least every 224 packets, otherwise data is exposed when the same IV is used for a second packet WEP does not provide a standard way to change keys! Often all stations are using the same key Immediate IV collisions between stations that share the RC4 Base Key Weak Key Attacks Forgery Attacks Replay Attacks Must Address All Problems Solutions must address all of the problems, otherwise new attack tools will be developed to exploit the remaining holes Need to address all of the problems IV Collisions Weak Keys Message Forgery Replay IEEE 802.11 TGi Short-term IEEE 802.11 Task Group i (TGi) is defining theTemporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) TKIP accommodates existing hardware with firmware and driver upgrade T