AReputationSchemeCombiningTrustandIncentiveforP2P.pptVIP

AReputationSchemeCombiningTrustandIncentiveforP2P.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
AReputationSchemeCombiningTrustandIncentiveforP2P.ppt

A Reputation Scheme Combining Trust and Incentive for P2P File Sharing Mao Yang,Qinyuan Feng,Yafei Dai,Zheng Zhang Peking University, Beijing, China Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China ICDCS2007,Toronto,Canada Outline Motivations The problem Proposal for a solution An experiment to understand some features of the solution Conclusions The “basics” of P2P file sharing system “Axiom 1”: a p2p file sharing system is in a healthy state if it has enough number of users and the number does not decrease. in a macro view “Axiom 2”: the only reason for an individual being a p2p user is to get what he wants easily. People tend to be free riders for public goods. After all, “free riding” is a fundamental phenomena in human society (Olson, Mancur 1966, The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge University Press ) The “basics” of P2P file sharing system “Law 1”: a volunteer-based p2p system is in a healthy state if it has enough good resources that can be easily accessed A: availability (quantity of quality resources) B: accessibility (high bandwidth, easy to find, not confusing, not frustrating) “Law 2”: a volunteer-based p2p system being in a healthy state is not because we have eliminated free-riders and colluders, etc. But,… Selfish users free-riders: download a lot, upload a little (purposely or not), negative to A Whitewashers, colluders: try to take advantage of incentive policy in a p2p system without actual contribution, negative to both A and B. “Malicious” users Intentionally upload fake files, negative to B To take advantage of traffic-based incentive policy To pollute the resource environment, so that innocent users get frustrated. Two general measures to keep users Incentives (awards) ? improve A provide some kind of reward for contributions such as points in Maze, TFT in BT and eMule Trust ? improve B Knowing the trustworthy of users or files, user has more confidence about what he is getting such as EigenTrust A duality formulation of award and trust A

文档评论(0)

suijiazhuang2 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档