CO_2气体保护焊焊接飞溅收集方案比较研究.docx

第 29 卷 第 4 期三峡大学学报(自然科学版)Vol. 29 N o. 42007 年8 月J of C hina Three Gorges Univ ,(Natural S ciences)Aug. 2007CO2 气体保护焊焊接飞溅收集方案比较研究王 燕1 乐欢欢1 付建科1 吴 敏1 秦东升2(1. 三峡大学机械与材料学院 ,湖北宜昌 443002 ;2. 山东电力建设第一工程公司, 济南 250100)摘要 :CO2 气体保护焊是广泛应用在生产中的焊接方法 ,但因为焊接时飞溅过大影响了焊接质量. 设计了 2 套飞溅收集方案,第 1 种方案是采用无限平板法进行收集,第 2 种方案是采用封闭法进行 收集. 通过对 CO2 气保焊飞溅的收集与测量, 结果表明 ,在相同的焊接条件下 ,平板法飞溅收集方 案所得的飞溅率小于封闭法所得的飞溅率 ,其原因是敞开的工作台上, 飞溅颗粒的运动造成部分 飞溅颗粒遗失而使所得飞溅率偏低, 测量精度有所下降;封闭法的收集装置能使飞溅颗粒的收集 遗漏率降低, 测量精度提高, 所得飞溅率较无限平板法高.关键词:CO2 气体保护焊; 飞溅; 收集方案中图分类号:TG444+ . 73 文献标识码:A 文章编号 :1672-948X(2007)04-0329-04The Comparative Research on Spatter Collection Scheme for CO2 Gas Shielded Arc WeldingWang Yan1 Yue Huanhuan1 Fu Jianke1 Wu M in1 Qin Do ngsheng2(1. College of Mechanical Material Engineering , China Three Gorges Univ . , Yichang 443002 , China ;2. S handong Electric Pow er Construction No. 1 Company , Jinan 250100 , China)Abstract CO2gas shielded arc w elding is widelyused in production , but the spatter produced in theweldprocess badly affects the quality of weld. So thattw o sets of spatter collection scheme w ere designed.Thefirst scheme collected spatter using infinite flat band method and the second scheme collected spatter using sealed method. H aving adopted the first and second scheme to collect and measure the spatter , the result show that the spatter ratio of flat band method is lower than sealed method under the same w eld condition. The rea-son is that the flat band method is open w orkbench and the m ovement of spatter granule lead to the loss of spatter granule , so the spatter ratio of flat band method is a little low er and the measure precision declined. Whereas the sealed method could decrease the loss of spatter granule and increase the measure precision , and the spatter ratio of sealed method is higher than infinite flat band method.Keywords CO2 gas shielded arc w elding ; spatter ; collection schem e　　CO2 气体保护焊(简称 CO2 气保焊)是目前生产优劣以及各自适用的场合, 以期为解决 CO2气保焊中以其低成本、高效率的特点被广泛采用的一种熔化飞溅问题提供可靠的实验依据和理论基