ZUCC USQ Suffing and Remuneration(人事与薪酬)大作业：品茶师雇佣.docVIP

This page is for the Evaluator’s Use Only MGT2000 Written Assignment (2012): Evaluation Sheet Student’s name: Xiangnan Zhou Evaluator’s initials: The marking criteria Evaluation of the marking criteria Common Weaknesses Common Strengths Overall quality of discussion presented in the assignment Evaluator: Indicate your assessment by highlighting __ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ on the scale – as shown here Introduction, body and recommendations Did not address the topic accurately __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ On task, highly informative and logical Application of theory Proposal was not based on relevant theoretical principals __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Clear use of theory to inform each element of the proposal Effective use of supporting literature Familiarity with course material No reference to the course material __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Effective use of course material Evidence of wider reading Used only course material __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Extensive use of other sources Relevant, scholarly and credible references (citations) used throughout the assignment Non- scholarly and/or irrelevant citations, overuse of direct quotes __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ All citations are scholarly, pertinent and effectively used Accurate use of referencing conventions and quality of writing Correct in-text referencing and precise list of references Harvard AGPS protocols not evident __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Consistently accurate with Harvard AGPS Coherent writing Writing was a challenge to understand __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ A pleasure to read Professional presentation of work that complied with instructions Not to a standard suitable to present in the workplace __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ A highly polished, professional document Score: / 100 marks To identify your assignmen