简论物权的优先效力.docVIP

简论物权的优先效力 作者姓名：周舒杰 专业班级：法学201109020108 指导老师：杨静 摘 要：《物权法》自颁布以来，在中国的法治建设中起着重要作用。“物权优先于债权”、“物权之间具有优先性”，作为物权优先效力的两大主干理应出现在《物权法》中。但《物权法》对其并无明确的阐释。究其原因，正是民法学界对二者的争议尚无定论。笔者认为，优先效力是物权有别于其他种类民事权利，尤其是债权所特有的对外效力，是各类物权共同的特性。物权在效力上优先于债权，原则上可坚持为两点：其一，不论何种类型的物权均优先于债权；其二，不论该物权成立之先后均优于债权。物权相互间的优先效力是以物权成立时间的先后确定物权效力的差异。由于物权存在着绝对性、支配力、变动规则和优先效力的体系化配置的需要，所以在设计物权的效力规则时，应当注意这些制度尽可能地契合无间，以达到《物权法》的完善推新。 关键词：物权 优先效力 债权  the Effect of the Real Research Priority Rights Abstract: The Property Law, since its promulgation, has a profound role in the construction of ruling by law of China. The two main concepts of the priority validity, “Property has priority over debt“ and “Priority exists among properties” should have appeared in the Property Law. However, there is no clear elaboration on the concepts in the Property Law. The reason is that the dispute on the concepts remains inconclusive in the field of civil law. As far as the writer is concerned, priority validity is the external validity that differentiates the property from other civil rights, especially the debt, and it is the common feature of all kinds of Properties. The property precedes the debt in terms of validity. In principle it can persist in two points: Firstly, all kinds of property have priority over the debt; secondly, no matter the property is established or not, it has priority over the debt. Meanwhile, since there is only the problem that whether the property is established or not, but not when the property is established, the priority validity among properties does not stand. The Property Law has the needs for absoluteness, dominance, changes of rules and the systemisation of priority validity. Therefore, when designing the validity rules of the property, these regimes should fit as seamlessly as possible to achieve the completeness of the Property Law. Key words: real rights；priority；obligatory rights 目 录 第1章 引言 1 1.1研究的目的和意义 1 1.2国内外研究现状及问题 1 1.3本课题要解决的主要问题和思路 1 第2章　物权优先效力的概述 2 2.1物权的效力 2 2.2物权的优先