- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
【摘要】 目的:比较经导管封堵与外科手术治疗继发孔型房间缺损(ASD)的疗效、安全性和费用情况。方法:采用相同的入选标准,选择继发孔型ASD患者 148人,其中介入治疗组82例,外科手术组66例。应用回顾性对比研究方法,比较两组的疗效、并症和费用情况。结果:介入治疗组和外科手术组的成功率分别为95.1%和100% (P=0.018) ,术后残分流率分别为3.5%和3.0% (P=0.833 )。心律失常为最常见并发症,介入组低于外科组(14.6% ∶31.8%,P0.05 ) ;介入组中无1 例患者需要输血,外科组中全部患者需要输血(P0.001 );介入组和外科组操作时间分别为(48±12.2) min和(158±16.4) min(P0.001 );介入组住院天数短于外科组[(6.0±2.0)d∶(13.0 ±3.0)d,P0.01]。介入组和外科组治疗费用分别为(26729±1675)元和(22393±1739)元(P0.05)。结论:外科手术较经导管封堵术成功率稍高、适应症广,但经导管封堵术却有手术时间短、并发症发生率低、创伤小、恢复快等优点。
【关键词】 心脏导管插入术 外科手术 房间隔缺损
Contrast analysis between transcatheter and surgical closure methods in patients with atrial septal defect/WU Guang|wei, LIN Ying|zhong, WANG Meng|jie,LU Zhi|hong,ZHAO Yi|lan, HU Chang|xing//
Abstract:Objective:To compare the safety , efficacy, complications and cost between transcatheter and surgical closure methods in patients with atrial septal defect (ASD).Methods:Retrospective analysis was done on 148 patients with secondum atrial septal defects: 66 cases were treated surgically and 82 cases were treated by transcatheter closure.The safety , efficacy, complications and cost between two groups were compared.Results:The instant procedural success rate was 95.1% for the transcatheter closure group and 100% for the surgical closure group (P=0.018 ).Total complication rates both of the transcatheter closure group and the surgical closure group were 18.3% and 34.8 % respectively (P0.05), Blood products were administered to 36 patients in the surgical group and no patient in the transcatheter closure group (P0.01).Mean operation time both of the transcatheter closure group and the surgical closure group was(48±12.2) min and (158±16.4) min(P0.001 );days of stay in hospital were (6.0±2.0) days in transcatheter occlude group,(13.0 ±3.0) days in surgery group respectively.Cost both of the transcatheter closure group and the surgical closure group were RMB (26729±1675) and RMB (22393±1739) respectively (P0.05).Conclusion:Transcatheter closure of s
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 中文自修杯汉字小达人第二至八届区级活动真题(答案).pdf VIP
- 舞蹈世界知到课后答案智慧树章节测试答案2025年春西北师范大学.docx VIP
- 车辆维修档案.doc VIP
- 单值移动极差控制图(现场用).xls VIP
- 运动解剖学(李世昌)第10章 内分泌系统.ppt VIP
- 2024年全国职业院校技能大赛中职组(婴幼儿保育赛项)省赛考试题库(含答案).pdf VIP
- 中国甲状腺功能亢进症和其他原因所致甲状腺毒症诊治指南(2022)解读PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 2017版油气田地面建设工程竣工验收手册表格.doc VIP
- 车辆维修档案管理制度.docx VIP
- 认识潜能课件-中职生创新创业能力训练.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)