- 1、本文档共27页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Condor Build Test:NMI, OMII, ETICS How the Condor Team Got Started in the Build/Test Business: Prehistory Oracle shamed^H^H^H^H^H^Hinspired us. The Condor team was in the stone age, producing modern software to help people reliably automate their computing tasks -- with our bare hands. Every Condor release took weeks/months to do. Build by hand on each platform, discover lots of bugs introduced since the last release, track them down, re-build, etc. What Did Oracle Do? Oracle selected Condor as the resource manager underneath their Automated Integration Management Environment (AIME) Relied on to perform automated build and regression testing of multiple components for Oracles flagship Database Server product. Oracle chose Condor because they liked the maturity of Condors core components. Doh! Oracle used distributed computing to automate their build/test cycle, with huge success. If Oracle can do it, why can’t we? Use Condor to build Condor! NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI) right initiative at the right time! opportunity to collaborate with others to do for production software developers like Condor what Oracle was doing for themselves important service to the scientific computing community NMI Statement Purpose – to develop, deploy and sustain a set of reusable and expandable middleware functions that benefit many science and engineering applications in a networked environment Program encourages open source software development and development of middleware standards Why should you care? From our experience, the functionality, robustness and maintainability of a production-quality software component depends on the effort involved in building, deploying and testing the component. If it is true for a component, it is definitely true for a software stack Doing it right is much harder than it appears from the outside Most of us had very little experience in this area Goals of theNMI Build Test System Design, develop and deploy a complete build system (HW and SW) c
您可能关注的文档
- Comparing the Economies of the UK, Germany and 比较英国、德国和德国的经济.ppt
- Comparing the governments of Brazil, Mexico, and Cuba比较巴西、墨西哥和古巴政府.ppt
- Comparing The Standards Across Grade Levels PK – 比较标准的跨年级PK–.ppt
- Comparing Windows NT and Netware 4 University of 相比Windows NT和NetWare 4大学.ppt
- Comparing “Jane Eyre” by Charlotte Btonte and “Wide Sargasso比较《简爱》夏洛特btonte和“书.ppt
- Comparison of Access Methods for TimeEvolving Data时间演化数据访问方法的比较.ppt
- Comparison of Disaster and Catastrophe Response 灾害与突变反应比较.ppt
- Comparison of dynamic pushup training and plyometric pushup比较动态俯卧撑训练和增强式俯卧撑.ppt
- Comparison of Golding’s Lord of the Flies and 戈尔丁的蝇王和比较.ppt
- Comparison of an Aerosol Assimilation System of MODIS一个MODIS气溶胶同化系统的比较.ppt
文档评论(0)