ppt课件-fixed-v.random-effects.pptVIP

Correlations Generally you will use ZCOR if you want to follow Hedges (this uses the r-to-z transformation) Input ri and ni rather than z and v with ZCOR if you want metafor to translate back to r for you. If you input z and v, you will have to back translate with Excel or a calculator. You can use COR or UCOR, but if you do, specify vtype = “LS” or vtype =“UB” and couple that with model = “HS” for Hunter Schmidt. Probably want to avoid this choice unless you really want the SH ‘bare bones’ results for your meta (you might if you are of the I/O persuasion). REVC calculation Metafor gives you lots of choices for estimating the REVC I would use one of these: method = “DL” (derSimonian Laird) REML (restricted maximum likelihood) HS (Hunter Schmidt) DL is very commonly used in Hedges’ type metas REML (default) gives slightly improved estimates to DL HS is for Schmidt Hunter meta Others are require you to do further study first Class exercise McDaniel (1994) data: Pearson correlations of job interview scores and subsequent job performance Run metafor analyses (modify the rma syntax) 1 common effects (use FE) 1 random effects (use DL) Interpret and prepare to share Fixed- v. Random-Effects Fixed and Random Effects 1 All conditions of interest – Fixed. Sample of interest – Random. Both fixed and random-effects meta-analyses attribute some observed variance to sampling error. For clear statements about fixed vs. random: Viechtbauer W: Conducting meta-analysis in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 2010, 36(3):1-48. Bonett DG: Meta-analytic interval estimation for Pearson correlations. Psychological Methods 2008, 13:173-189. Fixed Random 2 The residual variance after accounting for sampling error (and maybe other variables) is called random-effects variance. Some people say ‘between studies variance.’ REVC is the random-effects variance component. Hedges calls the REVC tau-squared - τ2. Hunter Schmidt talk about SDrho (square root o