refutationof thermodynamic laws( ro t l)（refutationof热力学定律(ro t l)）.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约10.07万字
约 24页
2017-01-29 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

refutationof thermodynamic laws( ro t l)（refutationof热力学定律(ro t l)）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Refutation of Thermodynamic Laws (RoTL)? Autymn D. C. lysdexia@v 1: 1316 Sep 2002 (30 k)v 3: 1629 Nov 2002 (101 k)additions: sections; corrected negative mass interpretation; natural asymmetries; lots of citations; figures; multidisciplines; propulsion; disgruntledness; vengeance; Hess1s Law; thermochemistry; N?ther1s Theorem; QED; more examples; Baez quotes!; corroborated discussions and press coverage; debunks Howe, Krieg, Bishop, Randi, ele, and their followers; electronics; particulate theory; complex interactions; corrected inequalities*Please redistribute this version everywhere.? Do it!? Print and fax it if you have to.? I need to get myself on other websites.*IntroFree Energy Related to AntigravityDealing with False ScepticsDebunking the DebunkersThermodynamic Laws Break Down ThereThermodynamic Laws Break Down HereTaking a BreakThe EndIntroAfter unloading the first draft of this essay on a few eGroups, I wanted to elaborate on some sections, polish others, make the transitions more natural and appropriate, and address others in the third person more often.? However, the people whom I am directly attacking shall still be addressed directly.? But to appeal to a general audience, they would need to be informed of why I brought up each subject without their being led through a confusing path formed by my stream-of-consciousness.? This version of the essay is still informal.? If you1d like, you can take the original version of this essay to see what I changed and added here.? The prologue above the essay is complimentary.In order to satisfy the thesis, as strange and unfamiliar as it may sound, it is my duty to show that all disciplines are reliant on more fundamental parents--categories--to describe and prescribe them.? Without such, the lower disciplines could not function.? Because of this undeniable relation, any of the lowers cannot be used as ends in themselves: One cannot claim that, after one person or a group of people in the past h