Diapositivo 1 RIHUC Pgina principal1 P和幻灯片中rihuc吉娜的主要225.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约8.02千字
约 36页
2017-02-10 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Diapositivo 1 RIHUC Pgina principal1 P和幻灯片中rihuc吉娜的主要225.ppt

1、本文档共36页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

* * * * * * * * Iberian Scientific Production Spain is demographically 4,2 x higher than Portugal In terms of Scientific Production is 6,3 x higher than Portugal * * * * Conclusion The portuguese scientific literature in this subject area shows a significant increase in the last 10 years, not only quantitavely (144%), but also at a qualitative level * * * * Conclusion The portuguese scientific literature in this subject area shows a significant increase in the last 10 years, not only quantitavely (144%), but also at a qualitative level * * * * Conclusion Growing visibility of investigation, assessed by the number of articles published in journals of international scope and prestige; publication in well positioned journals in its category ranking Increase of international collaboration Qualitative increase (positive development of Portuguese investigation in the field) * * * * Recommended Literature Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006 Jun 29;3:7 Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2007 Sep 20; [Epub ahead of print] King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 2004;430(6997):311-6. Manske PR. The impact of the impact factor. J Hand Surg [Am] 2004;29(6):983-6 Moya-Anegon FD. Coverage analysis of Scopus:a journal metric approach. Scientometrics 2007;73(1), 53-78 Nayak BK. The enigma of impact factor. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;54(4):225-6. Scully C, Lodge H. Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? Br Dent J 2005 ;198(7):391-3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EBCOG CongressActualiza??es em Oncologia 2008 * * Obstetrics Gynecology: evaluation of the portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators Helena Donato Carlos F. de Oliveira HUC * * “Without publication, science is dead” Gerard Piel