关于行政责任归责原则的研究综述.docVIP

 本科生专业文献综述 题 目: 关于行政责任归责原则的研究综述 姓 名: 马云豪 学 院: 人文社会科学学院 专 业: 法学 班 级: 法学42 学 号: 2264201 指导教师: 杨钦 职称: 助教 200 7 年5 月 30 日 南京农业大学教务处制 关于行政责任归责原则的研究综述 法学专业学生 马云豪 指导老师 杨钦 [摘要] 我国的行政法学以行政行为为核心，行政主体、行政行为和行政救济构成了行政法的理论体系，而行政责任是行政救济的重要内容。当前，我国理论界对行政责任这一领域还没有广泛、深入而系统地探讨。行政责任的归责原则作为追究行政主体行政责任的根本规则，它是行政责任理论的核心问题，在整个行政法学中占据重要地位。对行政责任的归责原则有三种通说，即过错责任原则、无过错责任原则和违法责任原则。由于引起行政责任的原因具有多样性，因此一些学者主张行政责任归责原则的多元化、体系化。 [关键词] 行政责任；归责原则；过错责任原则；危险责任原则；违法责任原则。 The Reseach Summary of Criterion of Administrative Liability Student majoring in law MA-Yunhao Tutor YANG-Qin Abstract:In china,administrative act is the core of administrative jurisprudence, The principal administrative, executive and administrative acts relief constitutes a theoretical system of administrative law ,and,administrative liability is the important content of administrative remedy. At present, our country theoretical circles administrative responsibility in this area has not been extensive, in-depth and systematic study. Criterion of administrative liability is the fundamental rule that investigates administrative liability of administrative subject.It is the core problem of the theory of administrative liability,which plays an important role in the whole subject of administrative law.There are three normal doctrines oncriterion of administrativeliability,principle of liability with fault,principle ofliability without fault,and principle of liability malfeasance.But the reasons that cause administrative liability are diverse,so some experts advocate the criterion of administrative liability should be multiple or systematic. Key words:administrative liability;criterion of liability;liability for fault;liability for risk;liability for illegal. 在我国的法治建设中，近年来不断提出了依