Remembering Bhopal专用课件.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共22页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Remembering Bhopal the worlds worst industrial catastrophe Summary of the incident in December 1984 in the capital of the Indian state‘s major accident hazards. Union Carbide owned by a pesticide plant gas leak underground storage tank. The leak of toxic methyl isocyanate甲基异氰酸酯 methyl isocyanate:a small dose of poison gas will cause inflammation炎症, in large doses will cause throat and lungs erosion腐蚀 and inflammation, severe choking and finally suffocated窒息. This accident has killed 2,500 people, more than 20 million people poisoned to varying degrees, with 10 million people permanently disabled and blind. Gas leak large amounts of food and water contamination, livestock and other large animals died, the ecological environment has been severely damaged. Summary of background and causes UCIL was the Indian subsidiary of Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) The UCIL factory was built in 1969 to produce the pesticide Sevin 西维因(UCC’ s brand name for carbaryl 胺甲萘) using methyl isocyanate (MIC) as an intermediate. A MIC production plant was added in 1979. During the night of December 2-3, 1984, water entered a tank containing 42 tons of MIC. The resulting exothermic reaction increased the temperature inside the tank to over 200 °C (392 °F) and raised the pressure. The tank vented releasing toxic gases into the atmosphere. And then the gases were blown by northwesterly winds over Bhopal. Theories differ as to how the water entered the tank. At the time, workers were cleaning out a clogged pipe with water about 400 feet from the tank. The operators assumed that owing to bad maintenance and leaking valves, it was possible for the water to leak into the tank. However, this water entry route could not be reproduced. UCC also maintains that this route was not possible, but instead alleges water was introduced directly into the tank as an act of sabotage by a disgruntled worker via a connection to a missing pressure gauge on the top of the tank. Early the next morning, a UCIL

文档评论(0)

dart002 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档