- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳用于颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术的效果分析.doc
丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳用于颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术的效果分析
【摘要】 目的:研究丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳用于颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术的麻醉效果。方法:选取2012年1月-2013年12月在笔者所在医院神经外科接受择期介入栓塞术的颅内动脉瘤患者108例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组56例和对照组52例。观察组患者术中麻醉维持采用丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳,对照组患者术中麻醉维持采用丙泊酚注射液(力蒙欣)。比较两组麻醉效果。结果:观察组麻醉诱导时、术中心率、MBP保持平稳,而对照组麻醉诱导时、术中心率、MBP波动较大,两组麻醉诱导和术中心率、MBP比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术毕自主呼吸时间、拔罐时间、意识恢复时间均短于对照组,OAAS评分高于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为3.57%,对照组为17.31%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳用于颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术,可保持术中患者生命体征平稳,有利于患者术后自主呼吸及意识的尽快恢复。
【关键词】 颅内动脉瘤; 丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳; 介入栓塞术
中图分类号 R739.41 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1674-6805(2014)20-0010-03
The Effect Analysis of Middle-Long Chain Fatty Milk of Propofol for Interventional Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms/YE Hong-li.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2014,12(20):10-12
【Abstract】 Objective: To study anesthetic effect of middle-long chain fatty milk of Propofol for interventional embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Method: One hundred and eight patients of intracranial aneurysm from January 2012 to December 2013 in the hospital were randomly divided into the control group of 52 cases and the treatment group of 56 cases. The observation group was given middle-long chain fatty milk of Propofol for anesthesia maintenance. The control group was given intraoperative Limengxian for anesthesia maintenance. Anesthetic effects of the two groups were compared after treatment.Result: Heart rate, MBP in observation group at anesthesia induction and intraoperatively held steady, and heart rate, MBP in the control group when at anesthesia induction and intraoperatively had more fluctuations, and the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant(P0.05). Spontaneous breathing recovery time and extubation time, consciousness recovery time in the observation group were significantly faster than the control group(P0.05). The complication rate of the control group was 17.31% while the observation group was 3.57% after treatment, and the difference between the two groups was statistically si
文档评论(0)