国际环境及其条约谈判--热点问题与中国的利益关注--.pptVIP

Unsure and Unswearing Negotiations of FinancingCombating Climate Change (UNFCCC) Xianliang YI Ministry of Foreign Affairs, China Oxford, August 2010  Content I The status quo: the process of commitment and unswearing II Interpretation of relevant parts of CA III UNFCCC: impossible to create a financial mechanism with stability and predictability VI AGF proposals: impractical and unacceptable for UNFCCC V IMO/ICAO: sectoral actions denote uncertainties and decades effort needed for mobilizing resources VI Chinas positions and perspectives I The situation quo 1. Limited resource and huge need and expectation resources under framework of UNFCCC: ---the 5th refreshment of GEF: 1.36 b US$ for climate of 4.25 b US$ ---Adaptation Fund: 149.6 m $ --- others needs: agreed: 30b US$ (fast start funding-FSF for 2010-2012 100b US$ (long-term finance arrangement-LFA for each yr from/ beyond 2020 UNDP: 200b US$ for mitigation and 49-171b$ for adaptation in developing countries in 2030 2. Ambitious promise but difficult action Promises made by some Parties (to the Copenhagen fast start fund) -US: 10b US$ (Obama, COP15) -Japan: 15b US$ (Hatoyama Initiative) -EU: 7.2 b Euro (EU Env. Ministersdecision) -Australia: 599 m AU$ -Canada: 400m US$ None one commits to carry the promise out except EU reiterates its announcement II Interpretation of the Copenhagen Accord 1. FSF 30b US$ should come public resources 2. LFA 100b US$ should majorly from public resources with supplemental by market mechanisms if they could take place then Q: how about the scale of 2013—2019? III UNFCCC Chapter III Enhanced action on the provision of financial resources and investment( Chairs Text to facilitate negotiations, Aug. 2010) Agreed something but with fundamental and substantial disagreements General agreement: 1.Scaled up, new and additional, predictabl