- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Science students critical examination of scientific科学生对科学的批判
Science students critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues Stein Dankert Kolst?1, Terje Kristensen2, Erik Arnesen1, Anders Isnes2, Ketil Mathiassen2, Idar Mestad1, Andreas Quale2, Anne Sissel Vedvik Tonning1, Marit Ulvik1 1University of Bergen, 2University of Oslo Scientific literacy Decisions on socioscientific issues Critical assessment of scientific claims 89 science teacher education students To assess the reliability of scientific claims Article of their own choice Related to a socioscientific issue Present their assessment in a short text. The study Focused on criteria used in examinations Qualitative analysis Identified thirteen different criteria focusing on 1. Empirical and theoretical adequacy, 2. Completeness of presented information 3. Social aspects Theoretical perspectives Socioscientific issues Two main questions Political / ethical Scientific Constructivist epistemology Disputed claims from the frontier of research Reliable consensual core science Examining socioscientific issues Contested scientific knowledge claims: Lay people perform expert evaluation? What criteria might be used to judge the trustworthiness of a scientific claim? Related issues Knowledge prerequisite for critical examination Intellectual independence Relevance of different criteria for science teaching Discussed in the paper Method Data collection 89 science teacher education students Groups of 2 and 3 Search the Internet for articles Socioscientific issue of interest Method Task Write an evaluation … Focus in particular on the trustworthiness of science-related claims … Twenty-nine articles Between a half and a full written page Analyzed using qualitative methods Findings part I Criteria focusing on empirical and theoretical adequacy Quality of references relevant references” prominent scientific journals” trustworthy and respected sources, Gr.24. Because the article [...] makes references to a great many concrete scientifi
您可能关注的文档
- Rise of Hitler in Germany Mrs希特勒在德国崛起夫人. Oliver's World History.pptx
- Rising Tensions上升的紧张局势. Stanford History Education Group.ppt
- Rise of an African American Mythos Western Oregon University一个美国黑人的神话西俄勒冈大学崛起.pptx
- Rise of Abbasids Mr阿巴斯先生的崛起. Robertson's Classroom Page.ppt
- Risk and Prevention of Bloodborne Pathogen 血源性病原体的风险与防范.ppt
- Risk Based Ebusiness Testing Gerrard Consulting基于电子商务的测试杰勒德咨询风险.ppt
- Risk Assessment Training mtpinnacle风险评估培训mtpinnacle.ppt
- Risk Factors for Female Infertility in an Agricultural Region农业区女性不孕症的危险因素分析.ppt
- Rise of Fascism Italy and Germany意大利和德国的崛起.pptx
- Risk Management rmi风险管理 RMI.msu.pptx
- 2025年鸡西市麻山区公益性岗位招聘8人(公共基础知识)测试题附答案.docx
- 杭州之江湾股权投资基金管理有限公司招聘参考题库附答案.docx
- 2026江苏辖区农村商业银行常熟农商银行校园招聘200人(公共基础知识)测试题附答案.docx
- 2025年中国石油新疆油田分公司秋季高校毕业生招聘360人(公共基础知识)综合能力测试题附答案.docx
- 2023年攀枝花市直属机关遴选公务员笔试真题汇编附答案解析(夺冠).docx
- 2026广发银行太原分行校园招聘(公共基础知识)测试题附答案.docx
- 2025四川成都医学院招聘事业编制辅导员10人(公共基础知识)测试题附答案.docx
- 2026年毛概期末考试试题库必考题.docx
- 2025年合肥市某国有企业2025年岗位外包招聘(公共基础知识)测试题附答案.docx
- 2026年重庆青年职业技术学院单招(计算机)测试模拟题库附答案.docx
原创力文档


文档评论(0)