Socioeconomic differentiation and selective migration in社会经济分化与选择性迁移.pptVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约5.56千字
约 12页
2017-03-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Socioeconomic differentiation and selective migration in社会经济分化与选择性迁移.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Socioeconomic differentiation and selective migration in社会经济分化与选择性迁移

Susanne Hjort, Department of Social and Economic Geography Socio-economic differentiation and selective migration in rural and urban Sweden Migration selectivity Who are the migrants? Where do they move? Segregation Gentrification Rural and urban contexts Segregation Gentrification Attitudes Background 4 Studies The attraction of the rural (who are the migrants?) Socio-economic segregation in Stockholm metropolitan area Rural gentrification Rural or urban? Life values and attitudes toward living environment and housing Time (1970)1985-1994, 2002 Type of studies Aggregated area data Micro level individual register data Survey Variables Socio-economic and demographic Survey questions concerning attitudes toward living environment and housing Methods Descriptive statistics Logistic regression models Map of Sweden Flows of migration Who is the urban migrant? Young (19-25) Single University educated High income Who is the rural migrant Older - net migration had an ageing effect on rural areas Families with children Married couples Self employed Comparing periurban to remote rural movers Periurban migrants more likely to have high income and education Remote migrants more likely to be self employed Patterns of urban segregation An apparent north south division of the city High income in the north and low income in the south Reinforced during the study period 1970-94 Signs of increasing polarization Patterns of rural gentrification Areas fairly close to large cities Areas connected with tourism Raised more questions How many areas? Segmented rural gentrification? Women driving rural gentrification? Attitudes: Rural or urban? Preliminary results show Rural and urban people opposite attitudes If rural positive then urban negative Coupled with previous int. studies Policy implications – economic development vs. preservation Synthesis Polarization - increasing? (segregation – gentrification) Between urban and rural areas Within urban areas Between urban and rural pe