- 1、本文档共20页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Some Insights on Development from the Economics of 从经济学发展的一些见解
Can Happiness Research Contribute to Development Economics and Policy?Presented to the World BankFebruary 13, 2007 Carol Graham University of Maryland/ The Brookings Institution Why Happiness Economics? New method combining tools and methods of economists with those typically used by psychologists Method captures broader elements of welfare than do income data alone Method is uniquely well suited for analyzing questions where revealed preferences do not provide answers, for example the welfare effects of institutional arrangements individuals are powerless to change (like inequality or macroeconomic volatility) and/or behaviors that are driven by norms or by addiction and self control problems (alcohol and drug abuse, smoking, obesity) While economists traditionally have shied away from reliance on surveys (e.g. what people say rather than what they do), there is increasing usage of data on reported well being (happiness): a) consistent patterns in the determinants of well being across large N samples across countries and across time b: econometric innovations help account for error and bias in survey data (AND with the error that exists in all kinds of data!!) Why NOT Use Happiness Surveys Biases in the way people answer surveys (question ordering/random events) Adaptation – at individual and country levels a) individual level: some psychologists believe that people ALWAYS adapt to their set point, even after extreme events like divorce or spinal cord injuries; THUS if a poor peasant, who has adapted to his/her condition and/or has low aspirations due to lack of information reports he/she is happy, what can development economists do with this information? b) country level: Easterlin paradox - average happiness levels have not increased as rich countries get richer and make improvements in other areas such as health, education; BUT……………… how long does it take individuals to adapt to these extreme changes? Equilibrium could be a LONG time away…..Do we no
您可能关注的文档
- Sicherheit in Rechnernetzen TUDTUD 网络安全.ppt
- SidneyPacific 20032004 House Government 西德尼政府亚太20032004年的房子.ppt
- sidechannel attack pitfalls侧信道攻击陷阱.ppt
- Sight Interpreting视觉解释.ppt
- Sight Words salem视觉单词塞勒姆.k12.va.us.ppt
- SIGN SUPPLY USA inxdigital供应美国inxdigital标志.ppt
- Signal Parameters Intel信号参数英特尔.ppt
- SIGNALING BY HAND FLAGS OR ARMS Weebly用手或手臂信号旗Weebly.ppt
- Signaling and Network Control GUC信令和网络控制创意.ppt
- Significance analysis of MicroarraysSAM SBEAMS基因芯片显著性分析山姆 sbeams.ppt
- 2025年城市社区安全风险评估报告.docx
- 2025年汽车共享出行平台市场潜力与用户增长策略研究报告.docx
- 2025年海洋矿产资源勘探技术环保标准与绿色勘探报告.docx
- 2025年主题公园沉浸式体验项目开发流程与规范指南报告.docx
- 2024年上海市妇幼保健中心招聘笔试真题.docx
- 《眼和视觉》 教学设计.docx
- 2025年智能健身器材阻力调节系统在健身器材行业市场拓展中的应用报告.docx
- 巫溪县xx水厂项目可行性研究报告(模板).docx
- 聚焦2025:医疗美容消费者心理洞察与服务质量提升策略研究.docx
- 2025年体检行业市场发展趋势报告:竞争格局与服务质量提升策略探讨.docx
文档评论(0)