【物理】期拉丁美洲研究.pptVIP

The advantages of the new calculation methods provided in the harmonized Pressure Vessel Standard EN 13445 Part 3. Comparison with the national standards used up to now. Fernando Lidonnici Convenor of WG’C’/CEN TC54 Sant’Ambrogio Servizi Industriali SRL - Milano Determination of the Nominal Design Stress for Steels in Service Conditions From the point of view of the nominal design stresses: EN 13445.3 permits higher stresses for: Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Austenitic Stainless Steels Nominal Design Stress for CS Plates with Rm=410 MPa Nominal Design Stress for CS Plates with Rm=510 MPa Nominal Design Stress for SS Plates type 304 Fine Grained Steels For Fine Grained Steels the present issue of EN 13445.3 still provides a safety factor of 2,4 on the room temperature tensile strength: the problem will be solved shortly with an amendment already approved. Nominal Design Stress for Fine Grained Steels with Rp0,2 = 460 MPa 2,5 Cr- 1 Mo Steels For Cr-Mo steels of large thickness subject to heat treatment the values of the ASME code are higher than the values in the corresponding EN standards: these values however are not guaranteed and therefore they are not reliable. Nominal Design Stress for 2,5Cr-1Mo Steels Domed Ends There is an advantage in using EN 13445.3 for domed ends, particularly at higher pressures. At low pressure the formulae of the ASME Code may be less conservative. Minimum Thickness of Korbbogen End with PS=5 bar Minimum Thickness of Korbbogen End with PS=10 bar Minimum Thickness of Korbbogen End with PS=50 bar Minimum Thickness of Korbbogen End with PS=100 bar Cylinders under External Pressure Either under vacuum or at higher external pressures EN 13445.3 permits lower thicknesses than ASME for a given unsupported shell length. Minimum Thickness of Stainless Steel Shell under Vacuum at 150°C Minimum Thickness of Stainless Steel Shell under 10 bar Ext. Pressure at 150°C Conical Reducers of constant thickness EN 13445.3 permits lower thickn