经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的比较研究.docVIP

经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的比较研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的比较研究.doc

经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的比较研究   【摘要】目的:分析并探讨经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检的差异。方法:选取2010年1月至2015年5月期间在我院接受治疗的可疑前列腺癌患者300例,分为观察组和对照组,每组150例。观察组采用经直肠前列腺超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检,对照组则采用系统的前列腺12针穿刺活检。结果:观察组前列腺癌57例,占38.00%,人均穿刺(9.3±1.4)针,单针阳性率为18.21%,Gleason评分为(7.1±0.5)分。对照组前列腺癌54例,占35.33%,人均穿刺12针,单针阳性率为11.17%,Gleason评分为(6.6±0.5)分。两组前列腺癌诊断率无显著差异,观察组其他各项指标明显优于对照组,经统计学检验,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组造影异常70例(46.7%),确诊前列腺癌41例,人均穿刺(6.19±0.7)针,单针阳性率为43.91%(191/435);观察组造影正常80例(53.3%),确诊前列腺癌16例,人均穿刺12针,单针阳性率为6.56%(63/960)。结论:经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检相比效率更高,临床上值得推广。   【关键词】前列腺穿刺活检;超声造影;超声   Comparative study of trans-rectal ultrasound contrast-assisted prostate biopsy and prostate system biopsyHONG Yun1, CHEN Jun2. 1.Department of Urology, Wenling Fourth People’s Hospital, Taizhou 317511, Zhejiang, China; 2.Department of Urology, Wenling First People’s Hospital, Taizhou 317500, Zhejiang, China   【Abstract】Objectives: To analyze and discuss the differences between trans-rectal ultrasound contrast-assisted prostate biopsy and prostate system biopsy. Methods: 300 cases of suspected prostate cancer treated in in Wenling City Fourth People’s Hospital from January 2010 to May 2015 were selected and divided into two groups as control group and observation group, with 150 cases in each group. Observation group received trans-rectal ultrasound-assisted prostate biopsy and control group received 12 prostate needles biopsy. Results: There were 57 cases of prostate cancer in observation group, accounting for 38.00%, per capita puncture (9.3 ± 1.4). Single needle positive rate was 18.21% and Gleason score was (7.1 ± 0.5) points. There were 54 cases of prostate cancer in control group, accounting for 35.33%, per capita puncture (12). Single needle positive rate was 11.17% and Gleason score was (6.6 ± 0.5) points. There were no significant differences in prostate cancer diagnosis between observation group and control group. Other indicators in observation group were better than these in control group,

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档