propheticprohibitions,liberallegalismandreasonable.docVIP

propheticprohibitions,liberallegalismandreasonable.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
propheticprohibitions,liberallegalismandreasonable

Prophetic Prohibitions, Liberal Legalism and Reasonable Recognition: The cartoon controversy as a problem case for multicultural recognition. By Sune L?gaard, Philosophy, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, laegaard@hum.ku.dk 1 Introduction The recent ‘cartoon controversy’ sparked by the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad in a Danish Newspaper was both the most dramatic reminder to date of the new multicultural reality facing Danish society and testimony to the difficulty for mainstream Danish society of coming to terms with multiculturalism. In the initial reactions to the cartoons, much as in the Rushdie affair, two extreme views were often set against each other, namely the view, held by some Muslims and Muslim organizations, that the publication was wrong, and should therefore be prohibited, and the view of the Newspaper and some of its supporters that it was legal, and therefore not wrong. Against this dichotomous standoff, however, many have suggested that even though publications such as that of the cartoons cannot be illegal in a liberal democracy, it can nevertheless be undesirable and even morally wrong. If this is so, in what sense, and due to which factors, can such religiously offensive publications be wrong, and if the wrongness does not translate into legal prohibitions or sanctions, what are its implications, and with respect to whom? This paper will discuss whether the politics of recognition provides a fruitful approach to this general problematic, using the cartoon controversy as a point of departure and example. Multicultural conflicts like the cartoon controversy have often been presented as issues of recognition and normative theories of multiculturalism designed to deal with such cases often take form as theories of recognition. In light of this, the paper asks a) whether the cartoon controversy can plausibly be construed as a case involving (lack of) recognition and disputed claims for recognition, b) what the relevant sen

文档评论(0)

jvdodnnv002 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档