researchintocross-straitpoliticaldefinition.docVIP

Research into Cross-Strait Political Definition Shaw Chong Hai* Preface There are two aspects of elements to be dealt with in the analysis of the definition of cross-strait relations: Firstly, there is not a clear meaning, unlike the respective political definitions of both sides. This is because the definition of cross-strait relations involves both sides’ interpretation. Secondly, the definition requires cross-strait interaction and will of cooperation, rather than evaluating one-sided action and experience. It is easier to clarify cross-strait “political definition” via “the relation of a spouse,” but “the relation of a spouse” complicates the analysis of the “definition of cross-strait relation.” In addition to the identification of a conjugal relation, it is a necessary to trace back how the historic developments and future trends are defined. For example, if “the relation of a spouse” is used to define “cross-strait relation,” then the initial definition will be reflected as a “divorced state.” After a long period of estrangement, both parties put their hatred aside and meet with each other casually. Both sides then seek “reconciliation.” This is the definition during the second stage. Owing to the lack of mutual trust after a long-lasting separation, it is possible for both sides to “part” with each other as they put forward unacceptable conditions. In a strict sense, either side has individually taken into consideration a “separation or integration.” This is the definition during the third stage. “The relation of a spouse” can only be made as a reference for the analysis of the definition of cross-strait relations without academic functions. Hence, another mode of definition shall be required. At any rate, the phased definition of the “the relation of a spouse” may provide a benchmark for this purpose. The author endeavors to define cross-strait relations as three phases. To achieve a better result in the analysis of cross-strait poli