transmittedbytheexpertfromec.docVIP

Transmitted by the expert from EC Informal document GRPE-62-09 (62nd GRPE, 7 – 10 June 2011, agenda item 4(e)) Corrigenda to the proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 49 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/16) A. Justification: This document provides amendments to the text provided in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/16. It proposes to correct an amendment, which already includes bold and strikethrough text, the text that differs from that provided in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/16, or which should have been shown as bold or strikethrough text in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/16, is shown as underlined text. B. Proposal: Page 2 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/16, correct Annex 9 to read Annex 9B Page 2, paragraph 4.2.3., correct to read: 4.2.3. Monitoring frequency …… When a monitor does At the request of the manufacturer, the approval authority may approve monitors that do not run continuously,. In that case the manufacturer shall clearly inform the Approval Authority and describe the conditions under which the monitor runs and justify the proposal by appropriate design elements (such as good engineering practice). A monitor shall be regarded as running continuously, if it?samples?at a rate not less than?twice?per second and concludes the presence or the absence of the failure relevant to that monitor within 15 seconds. If a computer input or output component is sampled less frequently than?twice per second for engine control purpose, a monitor shall also be regarded as running continuously, if the signal of the component is evaluated system concludes the presence or the absence of the failure relevant to that monitor each time sampling occurs. Page 4, paragraph 4.6.4.2., correct to read: 4.6.4.2. Presence / absence of a malfunction Following the sequence described in paragraph 4.6.4.1, the MI shall indicate the presence of a malfunction by a series of flashes or a continuous illumination, depending on the applicable activation mode, as described in the following pa