Description of the RACER System and its Applications.pdf

Description of the RACER System and its Applications.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Description of the RACER System and its Applications

Description of the RACER System and its Applications Volker Haarslev and Ralf Mo?ller University of Hamburg, Computer Science Department Vogt-Ko?lln-Str. 30, 22527 Hamburg, Germany Abstract RACER implements a TBox and ABox reasoner for the logic SHIQ. RACER was the first full-fledged ABox description logic system for a very expressive logic and is based on optimized sound and complete algorithms. 1 Introduction The description logic (DL) SHIQ [26] extends the logic ALCNHR+ [14] by ad- ditionally providing qualified number restrictions and inverse roles. ALCNHR+ was the logic supported by RACE (Reasoner for ABoxes and Concept Ex- pressions), the precursor of RACER (Renamed ABox and Concept Expres- sion Reasoner). Using the ALCNHR+ naming scheme, SHIQ could be called ALCQHIR+ (pronunciation: ALC-choir). ALCQHIR+ is briefly introduced as follows. We assume a set of concept names C , a set of role names R, and a set of individual names O . The mutually disjoint subsets P and T of R denote non-transitive and transitive roles, respectively (R = P ∪ T ). ALCQHIR+ is introduced in Figure 1 using a standard Tarski- style semantics. The term ? (⊥) is used as an abbreviation for C ? ?C (C ? ?C). If R, S ∈ R are role names, then R ? S is called a role inclusion axiom. A role hierarchy R is a finite set of role inclusion axioms. Then, we define ?? as the reflexive transitive closure of ? over such a role hierarchy R. Given ??, the set of roles R↓ = {S ∈ R | S ?? R} defines the sub-roles of a role R. We also define the set S := {R ∈ P |R↓ ∩ T = ?} of simple roles that are neither transitive nor have a transitive role as sub-role. Number restrictions are only allowed for simple roles. This restriction is moti- vated by a known undecidability result in case of an unrestricted syntax [25]. In concepts, instead of role names R (or S), inverse roles R?1 (or S?1) may be used. 1 Syntax Semantics Concepts A AI ? ?I ?C ?I \ CI C ? D CI ∩ DI C ? D CI ∪ DI ?R . C {a ∈ ?I | ? b ∈ ?I

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档