The Daugavet equation for operators not fixing a copy of $C(S)$.pdf

The Daugavet equation for operators not fixing a copy of $C(S)$.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
The Daugavet equation for operators not fixing a copy of $C(S)$

a r X i v : m a t h / 9 6 0 6 2 1 1 v 1 [ m a t h .F A ] 1 2 J u n 1 9 9 6 The Daugavet equation for operators not fixing a copy of C(S) Lutz Weis and Dirk Werner Abstract. We prove the norm identity ‖Id + T ‖ = 1 + ‖T ‖, which is known as the Daugavet equation, for operators T on C(S) not fixing a copy of C(S), where S is a compact metric space without isolated points. 1. Introduction An operator T : X → X on a Banach space is said to satisfy the Daugavet equation if ‖Id+ T‖ = 1 + ‖T‖; (1.1) this terminology is derived from Daugavet’s theorem that a compact oper- ator on C[0, 1] satisfies (1.1). Many authors have established the Daugavet equation for various classes of operators, e.g., the weakly compact ones, on various spaces; we refer to [1], [2], [4], [7], [10], [11], [13] and the references in these papers for more information. The most far-reaching result for operators on L1[0, 1] is due to Plichko and Popov [7, Th. 9.2 and Th. 9.8] who prove that an operator on L1[0, 1] which does not fix a copy of L1[0, 1] satisfies the Daugavet equation. (As usual, T : X → X fixes a copy of a Banach space E if there is a subspace F ? X isomorphic to E such that T |F is an (into-) isomorphism.) In this paper we shall establish the corresponding result for operators on spaces of continuous functions. Theorem 1.1 Let (S, d) be a compact metric space without isolated points. If T : C(S) → C(S) does not fix a copy of C(S), then T satisfies the Daugavet equation. 2 Lutz Weis and Dirk Werner In the next section we shall provide a direct proof of this theorem which is measure theoretic in spirit, and in Section 3 we shall give another argument which relies on a deep result due to Rosenthal [8]. Though this proof is much shorter it is less revealing than the one in Section 2; therefore we found it worthwhile to present both arguments. Either of our approaches depends on the analysis of the representing kernel of an operator T : C(S) → C(S); this is the family of Borel measu

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档