网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

Dahlsgaard_Peterson_ Seligman 2005 Shared virtue.pdf

Dahlsgaard_Peterson_ Seligman 2005 Shared virtue.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Dahlsgaard_Peterson_ Seligman 2005 Shared virtue

Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued Human Strengths Across Culture and History Katherine Dahlsgaard University of Pennsylvania Christopher Peterson University of Michigan Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania Positive psychology needs an agreed-upon way of classifying positive traits as a backbone for research, diagnosis, and intervention. As a 1st step toward classification, the authors examined philosophical and religious traditions in China (Confucianism and Taoism), South Asia (Buddhism and Hinduism), and the West (Athenian philos- ophy, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) for the answers each provided to questions of moral behavior and the good life. The authors found that 6 core virtues recurred in these writings: courage, justice, humanity, temperance, wisdom, and transcendence. This convergence suggests a nonarbitrary foundation for the classification of human strengths and virtues. Keywords: virtues, character strengths, positive traits, culture, positive psychology In recent years, strides have been made in understanding, treating, and preventing psycho- logical disorders. Critical to this progress are two widely accepted classification manuals— the American Psychiatric Association’s Diag- nostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disor- ders (DSM–IV; 4th ed., 1994) and the World Health Organization’s (1990) International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Consensual classifications are important because they pro- vide a common vocabulary for basic researchers and clinicians, allowing communication across professional groups as well as with the general public. The DSM–IV and ICD describe much of what is wrong with people, but what about those things that are right? Psychology has long ig- nored human excellence, in part because we lack a crucial starting point: an empirically in- formed, consensual classification of human vir- tues. Nothing comparable to the DSM–IV or ICD exists for human strengths. When psychol- ogists talk about mental health,

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档